Sponsored link
Thursday, March 28, 2024

Sponsored link

UncategorizedBREAKING: 8 Washington backers sue over waterfront height limits...

BREAKING: 8 Washington backers sue over waterfront height limits initiative

By Tim Redmond

Whatdya know? A few hours after I questioned Randy Shaw’s analysis of the legal weakness of the waterfront height measure (and said a lawsuit based on his concerns wouldn’t work), somebody has sued to force the measure off the ballot. And guess what: Two of the three plaintiffs were supporters of Prop. B, which would have allowed the 8 Washington project – and the legal theory they offer has nothing to do with Randy’s issue.

Corinne Woods, Michael Theriault, and Tim Colen filed suit Feb. 14th in an effort to get the initiative thrown off the ballot. Represented by the high-powered law firm of Remcho, Johansen and Purcel, they offer two arguments that amount to the same thing: Since the waterfront is public trust land, controlled by the Port of San Francisco, the voters have no right to attempt to regulate development.

That’s kind of crazy, since Prop. B – a ballot measure to allow development on Port land – was sponsored by these same folks. And it would mean that a long list of ballot measures controlling waterfront development, including Prop. H in 1990, which banned hotels on the waterfront and mandated a Waterfront Master Plan, would be invalid.

In essence, the suit relies on two arguments. The San Francisco waterfront, it says, is actually state land, under the Tidelands Trust concepts, with the Port given state authority to decide on its use. And the City Charter gives the Port the same authority – meaning the voters have no say.

That’s a lot to think about: The notion that, by law, the voters of San Francisco (who can elect a mayor who appoints the Port Commission) can’t vote on rules for how that land is used. But it’s probably the last, best hope that waterfront developers have, because if they can’t get it invalidated legally, they’re going to lose at the ballot box.

The case is Woods v. John Arntz, CPF 14-513503. If a judge agrees with the plaintiffs, it would mean a radical change in how San Francisco approaches waterfront land use.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. 

Marke B.
Marke B.
Marke Bieschke is the publisher and arts and culture editor of 48 Hills. He co-owns the Stud bar in SoMa. Reach him at marke (at) 48hills.org, follow @supermarke on Twitter.

Sponsored link

Featured

Screen Grabs: Fur flies in wrenching ‘The Fox’ and ridiculous ‘Dogman’

Cuddly canines comfort in Franz Streitberger’s World War II drama and kill in Luc Besson's new thriller.

SF prepares to evict people living in vehicles on Bernal Hill

After years of tolerance, parking enforcement set to start this week—but residents are already getting citations.

‘Dogman’ thriller’s stars dish on canine pasts—and strength of human connection

Luc Besson's latest features dozens of live pups, but Caleb Landry Jones and Jojo T. Gibbs were drawn to working with each other.

More by this author

Arts Forecast: Remembering Jess Curtis

The groundbreaking dance-maker passed suddenly this week. Plus: St. Patrick's Day events, CCA MFA expo, Scourge of Worlds, more.

Famed fingerstyle guitarist Brian Gore steps up to the mic

Founder of International Guitar Night finds his voice on heartfelt new album 'Seek the Love You're Yearning.'

Arts Forecast: The cool, clear eye of Wolfgang Tillmans

Plus: Flatstock, Afrolicious, Conrad Tao, Luis Miguel Garcia-Mispireta, Branford Marsalis, Chiquimamani-Condori, more
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED