Sponsored link
Tuesday, April 14, 2026

Sponsored link

DevelopmentActivists pressure Melgar on key element of mayor's Rich Family Zoning Plan

Activists pressure Melgar on key element of mayor’s Rich Family Zoning Plan

Land Use chair will have to decide between tenant activists and the mayor

-

The mayor’s Rich Family Zoning plan is going to be a tough vote for a lot of the supes, particularly on the West Side, where taller buildings and more density are not terribly popular.

But it’s shaping up as particularly tricky for Sup. Myrna Melgar.

Melgar, who has generally won with progressive support, represents D7, which has a lot of single-family homes and a fair number of people who want things to stay that way.

She also represents part of the Inner Sunset, which has more progressive voters, and more renters, and parts of Irving and Judah streets that may see small business displacement if smaller buildings are torn down to put up bigger, more expensive ones.

And here’s the tough part: Melgar has introduced amendments to the Lurie plan, which have been accepted by the mayor, that would limit the demolition of rent-controlled housing of three units or more.

But District 7 has some 2,000 units of rent-controlled housing in buildings with just two units.

Data from the City Planning Dept.

Under State Sen Scott Wiener’s latest bill, SB 79, two-unit rent-controlled buildings in “transit corridors” are subject to demolition. If the city doesn’t protect them in Mayor Daniel Lurie’s plan, we could see the demolition of a fair percentage of the 20,000 two-unit buildings in the city. Given the average family size of about 2.1 people per unit, that’s 4000 tenants at risk—although most of the housing on the East side of town is, for now, not in the new zoning plan.

City Planning data

Still, 4,00 tenants could be at risk in D7—and some activists are making a big issue of it.

Flyers with the headline “demolition notice” are appearing all over the district, delivered to rent-controlled buildings of two units. They urge Melgar to support Sup. Connie Chan’s amendments, which would block the demolition of any rent-controlled housing.

I asked Melgar yesterday why she wants to protect just buildings with more than three units, and she never responded. That’s unusual, since she usually answers my questions pretty quickly.

Melgar has been working with the mayor on the plan, and is in a political bind: If she votes to protect all rent-controlled housing, it will reduce the number of places where developers can demolish buildings and put up more luxury housing. If she doesn’t, there are going to be some very unhappy voters in D7.

Melgar chairs the Land Use and Transportation Committee, which will consider final amendments to the plan Monday/3.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.
Sponsored link

Featured

Alvin Ailey’s annual Berkeley run brought further ‘Revelations’

Revered African American dance company set sail for 'Jazz Island,' tackled a table-top 'Embrace,' and renewed a stone classic.

Puff: Flying high for 420 with a full week of Space Walk fest

Clone Fest, Cutie Pipes, the Herb Somm, dub dancing, Brownie Mary doc, and mind-blowing strains. Plus: You need this fast food bong.

A decade in, the Back Room still holds space for intimate musical encounters

Berkeley mainstay hosts 10-day concert series marking 10 years of diverse, all-ages, BYOB, communal gigs.

More by this author

Rich people are lying to seniors about the billionaire tax; does the news media care?

Plus: Protecting civilian control of the cops, and is SF 'a liberal oligarchy?' That's The Agenda for April 12-19

Why is the City Attorney’s Office ‘investigating’ a leaked document? It’s unprecedented and alarming

It's hard to see the focus on Sup. Fielder's Office as anything except a political vendetta, and the Chron should be ashamed to be part of it.

Supes reject illegal conversion that turned four rental units into one mansion

Critical vote not to accept Sauter deal sends a message to speculators—but there are plenty of other examples that the city has ignored
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED