Sponsored link
Saturday, April 18, 2026

Sponsored link

News + PoliticsDevelopmentSupes approve public notice for neighborhood zoning changes

Supes approve public notice for neighborhood zoning changes

Dorsey, Melgar, say the city should not 'alarm' people by telling them what's about to happen to their communities.

-

The Board of Supes approved by a veto-proof majority today a bill that would require the Planning Department to notify tenants, businesses and property owners about the massive new zoning changes proposed for the West Side of town.

The 8-3 vote came after two supes, Matt Dorsey and Myrna Melgar, warned that notification would cause under alarm in the impacted neighborhoods.

Dorsey said the notices would be “incredibly alarming.” Melgar said the city would be “needlessly alarming” people.

Sup. Connie Chan won a victory for neighborhood information

Melgar said the city didn’t send those notification in past major zoning changes—but as Sup. Connie Chan, who sponosored the bill, noted, taht was not necessarily a good thing.

Chan noted that the proposed increases in height and density would impact 13,000 acres, about half of the land in the city excluding parks. When it comes to public notice, she said, “the solution should always be to do more, not less.”

The opposition—from SF Yimby, among others—is based on the idea that residents, property owners, and small businesses who are directly informed that their neighborhoods are about to face dramatic change may organize against it.

That, it seems to me, is not “alarm.” That’s basic democracy: Not everyone these days reads the Chronicle or the SF Standard or 48hills, which have all reported on this. Not everyone on the West Side is fluent in English. A lot of the maybe 300,000 people and small businesses that will face potentially serious impacts (including displacement) are fully informed on what’s happening.

If bulldozers start demolishing existing buildings (the city planners say there will be no demolition of buildings with residential tenants, but there are a lot of other buildings that could be torn down for bigger ones), there’s going to be a whole lot of anger in the neighborhoods. And it will be a lot worse if it comes as a surprise.

Melgar, Dorsey, and Sup. Bilal Mahmood voted no.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.
Sponsored link

Featured

Karyn Gabriel’s ceramic sculptures ask, ‘Is beauty important?’

Drawn to the mantra of repetition and the stillness of nature, the Marin artist lets each work 'percolate on its own timeline.'

How ‘absurd grunge Cinderella’ Melissa Auf der Maur embraced her wild ’90s

Hole and Smashing Pumpkins bassist's intense memoir 'Even the Good Girls Will Cry' peels back rock icon mythos

Under the Stars: Irreversible Entanglements channel peace vibrations

Plus: DJ Platurn goes shopping, Earth Tongue jams and slithers, another winner from Bar Part Time, more music

More by this author

The best and worst of CA housing policy, on display at UCLA conference

Some rational discussion based on facts, and some Yimby presentations with no facts

What the new Chakrabarti poll really shows

The real question is not just percentage—it's who votes

Rich people are lying to seniors about the billionaire tax; does the news media care?

Plus: Protecting civilian control of the cops, and is SF 'a liberal oligarchy?' That's The Agenda for April 12-19
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED