Sponsored link
Thursday, October 22, 2026

Sponsored link

News + PoliticsDevelopmentSupes approve public notice for neighborhood zoning changes

Supes approve public notice for neighborhood zoning changes

Dorsey, Melgar, say the city should not 'alarm' people by telling them what's about to happen to their communities.

-

The Board of Supes approved by a veto-proof majority today a bill that would require the Planning Department to notify tenants, businesses and property owners about the massive new zoning changes proposed for the West Side of town.

The 8-3 vote came after two supes, Matt Dorsey and Myrna Melgar, warned that notification would cause under alarm in the impacted neighborhoods.

Dorsey said the notices would be “incredibly alarming.” Melgar said the city would be “needlessly alarming” people.

Sup. Connie Chan won a victory for neighborhood information

Melgar said the city didn’t send those notification in past major zoning changes—but as Sup. Connie Chan, who sponosored the bill, noted, taht was not necessarily a good thing.

Chan noted that the proposed increases in height and density would impact 13,000 acres, about half of the land in the city excluding parks. When it comes to public notice, she said, “the solution should always be to do more, not less.”

The opposition—from SF Yimby, among others—is based on the idea that residents, property owners, and small businesses who are directly informed that their neighborhoods are about to face dramatic change may organize against it.

That, it seems to me, is not “alarm.” That’s basic democracy: Not everyone these days reads the Chronicle or the SF Standard or 48hills, which have all reported on this. Not everyone on the West Side is fluent in English. A lot of the maybe 300,000 people and small businesses that will face potentially serious impacts (including displacement) are fully informed on what’s happening.

If bulldozers start demolishing existing buildings (the city planners say there will be no demolition of buildings with residential tenants, but there are a lot of other buildings that could be torn down for bigger ones), there’s going to be a whole lot of anger in the neighborhoods. And it will be a lot worse if it comes as a surprise.

Melgar, Dorsey, and Sup. Bilal Mahmood voted no.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. 

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.
Sponsored link

Featured

OPINION: Why professional journalists are opposing Proposition A

The measure would weaken the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force, and the public's access to records

State workers hold one-day strike

Their contract expired June 30. The state won't even consider their proposals

Kids dive into the wondrous world of dance at ODC’s ‘Family Matters’

The series weaves performance, discussion, and demonstration into a joyful access point for tomorrow's arts patrons.

More by this author

Here’s what the supes ought to be asking the mayor

Tech worker horrors, Money to fight ICE, data centers, affordable housing: What a missed opportunity Tuesday's meeting will be.

The city’s a mess. The supes don’t want to question the mayor

Plus: How to expand equity with neighborhood schools—and will Lurie's agenda create a sterile city that nobody will celebrate in 50 years? That's The Agenda for OCt. 18-25

Another bad Congressional ‘debate’ reflects the failures of local media and US politics

Nobody challenged the basic assumptions in Wiener's question, or his comments on AI money
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED