Sponsored link
Wednesday, February 25, 2026

Sponsored link

News + PoliticsDevelopmentSupes approve public notice for neighborhood zoning changes

Supes approve public notice for neighborhood zoning changes

Dorsey, Melgar, say the city should not 'alarm' people by telling them what's about to happen to their communities.

-

The Board of Supes approved by a veto-proof majority today a bill that would require the Planning Department to notify tenants, businesses and property owners about the massive new zoning changes proposed for the West Side of town.

The 8-3 vote came after two supes, Matt Dorsey and Myrna Melgar, warned that notification would cause under alarm in the impacted neighborhoods.

Dorsey said the notices would be “incredibly alarming.” Melgar said the city would be “needlessly alarming” people.

Sup. Connie Chan won a victory for neighborhood information

Melgar said the city didn’t send those notification in past major zoning changes—but as Sup. Connie Chan, who sponosored the bill, noted, taht was not necessarily a good thing.

Chan noted that the proposed increases in height and density would impact 13,000 acres, about half of the land in the city excluding parks. When it comes to public notice, she said, “the solution should always be to do more, not less.”

The opposition—from SF Yimby, among others—is based on the idea that residents, property owners, and small businesses who are directly informed that their neighborhoods are about to face dramatic change may organize against it.

That, it seems to me, is not “alarm.” That’s basic democracy: Not everyone these days reads the Chronicle or the SF Standard or 48hills, which have all reported on this. Not everyone on the West Side is fluent in English. A lot of the maybe 300,000 people and small businesses that will face potentially serious impacts (including displacement) are fully informed on what’s happening.

If bulldozers start demolishing existing buildings (the city planners say there will be no demolition of buildings with residential tenants, but there are a lot of other buildings that could be torn down for bigger ones), there’s going to be a whole lot of anger in the neighborhoods. And it will be a lot worse if it comes as a surprise.

Melgar, Dorsey, and Sup. Bilal Mahmood voted no.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.
Sponsored link

Featured

And now, another big tax cut for the developers and speculators in SF

Lurie, Mahmood want to eliminate affordable housing money to help the profits of luxury developers

What we saw at Sundance 2026: 9 narrative features that found the plot

'Buddy' taps horror in children's TV, Channing Tatum shines as SF father in Beth de Araújo's 'Josephine', a surprising wartime divorce comedy soars.

BIG WEEK: Black Choreographers Fest, Sunset Night Market, FAGJAZZ, Winterfest, more

Plus: Maara, Psychedelics and Cinema, Chulita Vinyl Club, Dr. Bittinger, 'The Voice of Hind Rajab', more.

More by this author

And now, another big tax cut for the developers and speculators in SF

Lurie, Mahmood want to eliminate affordable housing money to help the profits of luxury developers

No, taxes on billionaires won’t destroy innovation in California

Tax opponents are putting out a line that makes no sense; just look at Bay Area tech history

Bernie Sanders talks about AI—and the billionaires who control it

Plus: The DCCC holds its endorsements meeting, and the supes vote on more chain stores and an illegal $40 million luxury hotel tax break. That's The Agenda for Feb. 22-March 1
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED