Sponsored link
Sunday, April 12, 2026

Sponsored link

News + PoliticsBusiness + TechAirbnb, under pressure from labor, drops $120 million lawsuit against SF

Airbnb, under pressure from labor, drops $120 million lawsuit against SF

After calls for boycott, giant company folds in a win for activists who fight corporate tax cuts

-

Just as the city hits the beginning of a brutal budget season, one of the major corporate players who played a big role in the deficit has buckled: Airbnb abruptly dropped its $120 million suit against the city.

Activists, particularly in labor, have been pushing for more than a year to demand that the rogue company, which has cost tens of thousands of tenants their homes, quit holding up the city for big money in a time of crisis.

A labor-led coalition called for a boycott of Airbnb.

Calls for a boycott of Aribnb seem to have made a difference

The company’s lawsuit alleged that the city put Airbnb in the wrong category for business taxes. It’s entirely possible that the giant corporation, which got its start from creating illegal hotel rooms in San Francisco, just decided that its legal case was a loser, and gave up.

But high-priced corporate lawyers don’t tend to file cases that they know are bogus, and the City Attorney’s Office didn’t file a motion to dismiss on the grounds that there is no case here.

I have no inside information, but it seems likely this is more about politics than law: Airbnb, already under attack because its co-founder, Joe Gebbia, has been working with Trump, would rather not be the Number One Bad Guy in the upcoming budget fight.

As long as the suit was pending, the city had to put $120 million—enough money to fund all of the cuts to nonprofits and service providers that the mayor is proposing—aside in a contingency account.

The message: Airbnb is forcing cuts to public health, education, violence prevention, LGBTQI services, and so much more.

Airbnb’s revenue in 2025 was $12.2 billion, with profits of $2.1 billion. Backing off the lawsuit was a minor cost of doing business.

The decision is also a sign that progressive organizations can successfully fight back against big corporate tax cuts. That’s a bit of good news as the mayor’s terrible budget moves forward.

Now that money is available.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.
Sponsored link

Featured

Why is the City Attorney’s Office ‘investigating’ a leaked document? It’s unprecedented and alarming

It's hard to see the focus on Sup. Fielder's Office as anything except a political vendetta, and the Chron should be ashamed to be part of it.

Screen Grabs: Balboa Theater hits 100—and honors a costuming legend

Plus: 'Return to Oz,' a new Camus, Doris Day's cult lesbian moment, Paleolithic Herzog, 'Faces of Death,' more

How to catch a crab

Reeling in a delicious catch—and finding a friendly community—at Pacifica Pier and beyond.

More by this author

Why is the City Attorney’s Office ‘investigating’ a leaked document? It’s unprecedented and alarming

It's hard to see the focus on Sup. Fielder's Office as anything except a political vendetta, and the Chron should be ashamed to be part of it.

Supes reject illegal conversion that turned four rental units into one mansion

Critical vote not to accept Sauter deal sends a message to speculators—but there are plenty of other examples that the city has ignored

Four rental units become one $4.75 million mansion. Will the supes legalize it?

Vote on Vallejo St. property would set a dangerous precedent for speculators to destroy rent-controlled housing
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED