Sponsored link
Wednesday, December 31, 2025

Sponsored link

ElectionsCampaign TrailProgressives are resisting the billionaire takeover of San Francisco

Progressives are resisting the billionaire takeover of San Francisco

It's an awful night for the United States, but it's not so bad here.

-

The future of the country looks terrible tonight. I remember many years ago, when Republicans won most of the statewide races in California, Bob Mulholland, the late political director of the California Democratic Party, sent out an email that started:

“I feel like I am at a train wreck and there are no survivors.”

Sup. Aaron Peskin addresses the crowd, saying there are a lot of votes still to count

Donald Trump will be the president for the next four years, if he lasts that long. Republicans will control the US Senate and possibly the House, and they already have the Supreme Court.

It’s going to be a brutal two years, and after things go really badly, the Democrats will probably retake the House and Senate. More on why all of this happened as we take stock in the next few days.

But on the local level, the billionaire takeover of San Francisco politics has not been entirely successful; in fact, progressives appear tonight to have won some critical victories.

Bilal Mahmood was ahead in D5 after the first results came in, but as we predicted, those were the more conservative votes, and Sup. Dean Preston is now in the lead (despite a massive, big-money effort to oust him.) Jackie Fielder appears to be the next supervisor from D9. Sup. Connie Chan appears to be holding on to her seat in D1. It’s possible that Chyanne Chen, with the second-place votes of E.J. Jones, could emerge on top in D11.

The big billionaire ballot item—Prop. D—is going down, handily, and Sup. Aaron Peskin’s Prop. C, which will create an inspector general, is winning even more handily. Prop. F, the measure to spend more money on cops, is going to lose. Prop. L, the tax on Uber and Lyft to fund Muni is winning (although so is the larger business-tax reform, Prop. M, which is getting more votes and my nullify Prop. L—but the message from the voters is clear that Uber and Lyft should be taxed to fund public transportation.

So progressives might wind up with enough votes on the Board of Supes to sometimes forge a majority, and the billionaire forces don’t have enough to control everything.

The mayor’s race is still too close to call, and there are lots of votes still to count. As the more progressive election-day votes come in, Peskin is still in third but moving up, and it’s possible he could overtake Mayor London Breed in second place. Then it would come down to how many Breed voters put Peskin second, and how many Mark Farrell voters put Daniel Lurie second.

Considering the vast sums of money spent against them, the progressives are, so far, clearly holding their own in San Francisco.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.
Sponsored link
Sponsored link

Featured

Year in Music 2025: The Bay made magical noise

SPELLLING's R&B wild-out, Orcutt Shelley Miller's moonlit jams, Spiritual Cramp's guerrilla punk... a watershed year for local ears

Year in Music 2025: We will not be dumbed down

Artists are finally teasing out a happy medium between digital and analog, with surprisingly audacious releases.

‘Nonsense, folly, and impertinence:’ Some predictions for 2026

Wherein the Month, and Day of the Month, are set down, the Persons named, and the Great Actions and Events of next Year related as they will come to pass.

More by this author

For more than half a century, the progressives in SF have been right—and the developers wrong

We have murals and books and movies celebrating the opponents of demolitions like the I-Hotel and redevelopment. What will we look back on 20 years from now?

PG&E offers more excuses, and will seek to delay and obfuscate over public power

Public power is cheaper, more reliable, and would make money for the city. Just look at the numbers

SF could move to take over PG&E’s system right now, if city officials had the political will

We don't need a new state bill or more hearings. The city could start the public power process immediately—and send a powerful message to the state
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED