Sponsored link
Saturday, November 7, 2026

Sponsored link

News + PoliticsBusiness + TechAirbnb, under pressure from labor, drops $120 million lawsuit against SF

Airbnb, under pressure from labor, drops $120 million lawsuit against SF

After calls for boycott, giant company folds in a win for activists who fight corporate tax cuts

-

Just as the city hits the beginning of a brutal budget season, one of the major corporate players who played a big role in the deficit has buckled: Airbnb abruptly dropped its $120 million suit against the city.

Activists, particularly in labor, have been pushing for more than a year to demand that the rogue company, which has cost tens of thousands of tenants their homes, quit holding up the city for big money in a time of crisis.

A labor-led coalition called for a boycott of Airbnb.

Calls for a boycott of Aribnb seem to have made a difference

The company’s lawsuit alleged that the city put Airbnb in the wrong category for business taxes. It’s entirely possible that the giant corporation, which got its start from creating illegal hotel rooms in San Francisco, just decided that its legal case was a loser, and gave up.

But high-priced corporate lawyers don’t tend to file cases that they know are bogus, and the City Attorney’s Office didn’t file a motion to dismiss on the grounds that there is no case here.

I have no inside information, but it seems likely this is more about politics than law: Airbnb, already under attack because its co-founder, Joe Gebbia, has been working with Trump, would rather not be the Number One Bad Guy in the upcoming budget fight.

As long as the suit was pending, the city had to put $120 million—enough money to fund all of the cuts to nonprofits and service providers that the mayor is proposing—aside in a contingency account.

The message: Airbnb is forcing cuts to public health, education, violence prevention, LGBTQI services, and so much more.

Airbnb’s revenue in 2025 was $12.2 billion, with profits of $2.1 billion. Backing off the lawsuit was a minor cost of doing business.

The decision is also a sign that progressive organizations can successfully fight back against big corporate tax cuts. That’s a bit of good news as the mayor’s terrible budget moves forward.

Now that money is available.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. 

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.
Sponsored link
Sponsored link

Featured

With a Hi-NRG burst, ‘On the Floor’ dives again into queer nightlife and the AIDS crisis

Maria Silk and Théophylle Dcx's revamped dance piece returns, radiating fresh energy and spectral links.

Taylor Mac’s queer songbook is built to last

Stage icon's one-night splash at Curran Theatre promises heart-first resistance for a too-tough world.

Mayor Lurie has a big problem

The voters gave him everything he wanted. Now he has to govern with no excuses

More by this author

Mayor Lurie has a big problem

The voters gave him everything he wanted. Now he has to govern with no excuses

Why the billionaires won

A green tsunami of Big Tech money swamped any hope of a progressive message. The Chron didn't help.

Democrats—and the progressive movement—win big nationally. SF votes with the billionaires

Wiener wins. Lurie wins. Big money has a big, ugly night.
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED