Sponsored link
Thursday, March 5, 2026

Sponsored link

News + PoliticsBusiness + TechAirbnb, under pressure from labor, drops $120 million lawsuit against SF

Airbnb, under pressure from labor, drops $120 million lawsuit against SF

After calls for boycott, giant company folds in a win for activists who fight corporate tax cuts

-

Just as the city hits the beginning of a brutal budget season, one of the major corporate players who played a big role in the deficit has buckled: Airbnb abruptly dropped its $120 million suit against the city.

Activists, particularly in labor, have been pushing for more than a year to demand that the rogue company, which has cost tens of thousands of tenants their homes, quit holding up the city for big money in a time of crisis.

A labor-led coalition called for a boycott of Airbnb.

Calls for a boycott of Aribnb seem to have made a difference

The company’s lawsuit alleged that the city put Airbnb in the wrong category for business taxes. It’s entirely possible that the giant corporation, which got its start from creating illegal hotel rooms in San Francisco, just decided that its legal case was a loser, and gave up.

But high-priced corporate lawyers don’t tend to file cases that they know are bogus, and the City Attorney’s Office didn’t file a motion to dismiss on the grounds that there is no case here.

I have no inside information, but it seems likely this is more about politics than law: Airbnb, already under attack because its co-founder, Joe Gebbia, has been working with Trump, would rather not be the Number One Bad Guy in the upcoming budget fight.

As long as the suit was pending, the city had to put $120 million—enough money to fund all of the cuts to nonprofits and service providers that the mayor is proposing—aside in a contingency account.

The message: Airbnb is forcing cuts to public health, education, violence prevention, LGBTQI services, and so much more.

Airbnb’s revenue in 2025 was $12.2 billion, with profits of $2.1 billion. Backing off the lawsuit was a minor cost of doing business.

The decision is also a sign that progressive organizations can successfully fight back against big corporate tax cuts. That’s a bit of good news as the mayor’s terrible budget moves forward.

Now that money is available.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.
Sponsored link

Featured

How close are Lurie and SFPD to ICE?

Disturbing comments by (former) head of homeland security and SFPOA suggest more cooperation than the Sanctuary City ordinance allows

The North Beach Carol Doda mural will rise again

After a tribute to the neighborhood's eternal topless queen is unceremoniously pulled off stage, its artist is set on a second act.

Born to the circus, Gypsy Snider brings acrobatic flair to ODC’s ‘Dance Downtown’

At the meeting of two performance traditions, 'I came here to make bodies move in space'.

More by this author

How close are Lurie and SFPD to ICE?

Disturbing comments by (former) head of homeland security and SFPOA suggest more cooperation than the Sanctuary City ordinance allows

DA Brooke Jenkins attacks unions, says the city needs to be nicer to billionaires

At conference for democrats who want to crush the left, Jenkins says the city is at a "reckoning" with local labor

Why is Trump going to war with Iran?

Plus: Finally, a supervisor calls out City Planning for ignoring affordable housing, and the next move toward a public bank. That's The Agenda for March 1-8
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED