Sponsored link
Sunday, April 12, 2026

Sponsored link

News + PoliticsImmigrationHow close are Lurie and SFPD to ICE?

How close are Lurie and SFPD to ICE?

Disturbing comments by (former) head of homeland security and SFPOA suggest more cooperation than the Sanctuary City ordinance allows

-

When Mayor Daniel Lurie talked with Donald Trump on the phone last fall, reporters started to wonder: What, exactly, did the two discuss for 20 minutes?

The Sunshine Ordinance Task Force concluded that any records of the call (was it recorded? Did the mayor or his staff take notes?) should be released.

But the Mayor’s Office has refused to comply, saying any information would be covered by “attorney-client privilege,” which suggests there was a deputy city attorney present.

What did Lurie say to Trump—and why does Kristi Noem say he’s very “cooperative?”

Now we are, maybe, a little bit, getting an idea of what happened—and the latest information suggests more collaboration between City Hall, the SFPD, and the Department of Homeland Security than anyone has yet admitted.

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem was speaking this morning to a police conference (she had just been fired on social media, but didn’t seem to know or acknowledge that) when Chris Galligan, the vice president of the San Francisco Police Officers Association asked whether the department could do more to help local agencies.

From the SF Standard, which broke the story:

“You maybe have some challenges in San Francisco just because of your state laws and local laws,” Noem replied. “Although you’ve got a mayor that works with us very well. He probably doesn’t want me to talk about it a lot, actually. But he has been cooperative and we have great conversations and talk quite often.”

MissionLocal reports that maybe Noem and Lurie don’t actually talk “often.” That would not be a surprise: Noem, like many in the Trump Administration, has issues with telling the truth.

But that’s not the issue here. The vice president of the SFPOA, an organization that by law is not supposed to cooperate with ICE, asked how the locals could work better with the feds—and the person who until today oversaw ICE said that the mayor of San Francisco, who by law is not supposed to do anything to cooperate with ICE, was “very cooperative.”

The Mayor’s Office has no comment on Noem’s statement. Noem has nothing more to say, I’m sure, since she’s no longer the head of homeland security.

This should make all of us at least a little bit nervous.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.
Sponsored link

Featured

Why is the City Attorney’s Office ‘investigating’ a leaked document? It’s unprecedented and alarming

It's hard to see the focus on Sup. Fielder's Office as anything except a political vendetta, and the Chron should be ashamed to be part of it.

Screen Grabs: Balboa Theater hits 100—and honors a costuming legend

Plus: 'Return to Oz,' a new Camus, Doris Day's cult lesbian moment, Paleolithic Herzog, 'Faces of Death,' more

How to catch a crab

Reeling in a delicious catch—and finding a friendly community—at Pacifica Pier and beyond.

More by this author

Why is the City Attorney’s Office ‘investigating’ a leaked document? It’s unprecedented and alarming

It's hard to see the focus on Sup. Fielder's Office as anything except a political vendetta, and the Chron should be ashamed to be part of it.

Supes reject illegal conversion that turned four rental units into one mansion

Critical vote not to accept Sauter deal sends a message to speculators—but there are plenty of other examples that the city has ignored

Four rental units become one $4.75 million mansion. Will the supes legalize it?

Vote on Vallejo St. property would set a dangerous precedent for speculators to destroy rent-controlled housing
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED