Sponsored link
Thursday, September 10, 2026

Sponsored link

News + PoliticsImmigrationHow close are Lurie and SFPD to ICE?

How close are Lurie and SFPD to ICE?

Disturbing comments by (former) head of homeland security and SFPOA suggest more cooperation than the Sanctuary City ordinance allows

-

When Mayor Daniel Lurie talked with Donald Trump on the phone last fall, reporters started to wonder: What, exactly, did the two discuss for 20 minutes?

The Sunshine Ordinance Task Force concluded that any records of the call (was it recorded? Did the mayor or his staff take notes?) should be released.

But the Mayor’s Office has refused to comply, saying any information would be covered by “attorney-client privilege,” which suggests there was a deputy city attorney present.

What did Lurie say to Trump—and why does Kristi Noem say he’s very “cooperative?”

Now we are, maybe, a little bit, getting an idea of what happened—and the latest information suggests more collaboration between City Hall, the SFPD, and the Department of Homeland Security than anyone has yet admitted.

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem was speaking this morning to a police conference (she had just been fired on social media, but didn’t seem to know or acknowledge that) when Chris Galligan, the vice president of the San Francisco Police Officers Association asked whether the department could do more to help local agencies.

From the SF Standard, which broke the story:

“You maybe have some challenges in San Francisco just because of your state laws and local laws,” Noem replied. “Although you’ve got a mayor that works with us very well. He probably doesn’t want me to talk about it a lot, actually. But he has been cooperative and we have great conversations and talk quite often.”

MissionLocal reports that maybe Noem and Lurie don’t actually talk “often.” That would not be a surprise: Noem, like many in the Trump Administration, has issues with telling the truth.

But that’s not the issue here. The vice president of the SFPOA, an organization that by law is not supposed to cooperate with ICE, asked how the locals could work better with the feds—and the person who until today oversaw ICE said that the mayor of San Francisco, who by law is not supposed to do anything to cooperate with ICE, was “very cooperative.”

The Mayor’s Office has no comment on Noem’s statement. Noem has nothing more to say, I’m sure, since she’s no longer the head of homeland security.

This should make all of us at least a little bit nervous.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.
Sponsored link

Featured

The world, and my life, changed on Sept. 11, 25 years ago

I was a few blocks away from Ground Zero. I didn't even know what happened until I went out for a coffee I will never forget

Fall Festivals Preview: 10 fab fairs and fests to light up the season

Diwali jams, food raves, science celebrations, and the last of this year’s county fairs. Oh, and Godzilla.

Fall Food Preview: Fresh openings, classic comebacks, big mall glow-ups

Reasons to Rize Up, Meat Packers with buns, My Friend Fernando sets down roots, more steaming news and rumors

More by this author

Lurie and Mamdani could not be more different

Plus: Big Tech money moves into D10 .... and will the Planning Commission approve a project without knowing what it is? That's The Agenda for Sept. 7-14

SFPD drone spying policy faces backlash

Community groups, commission members dubious about letting cops use surveillance technology without more guardrails

Let’s just say it: The SF Democratic Party has become a total embarrassment

A progressive city has an incompetent, right-wing clown show controlling the local party
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED