Sponsored link
Wednesday, September 16, 2026

Sponsored link

News + PoliticsCity HallPlan to 'streamline' commissions faces widespread opposition at supes hearing

Plan to ‘streamline’ commissions faces widespread opposition at supes hearing

Eliminate Police Commission oversight? Wipe out commissions on the arts, women, homeless oversight? Activists are not happy

-

Former City Controller Ed Harrington addressed the Board of Supes today, describing the work he did as the head of a task force charged with “streamlining” the city’s commission structure, and made a very clear and useful point:

“If you have power and you trust people [in charge], then you want as little as possible in the City Charter. If you have less power and trust, you want as much as possible in the Charter.”

In other words: The mayor and his allies, who have power, want to get rid of commissions and move much governmental oversight into the Administrative Code, which the supes and the mayor can change at will. A long list of speakers from community-based groups, who lack power, want their opportunities to engage with the city protected in the Charter.

Sup. Shamann Walton: ‘Is this the San Francisco we want to be?’

Margaret Brodkin, who led the fight to create the Commission on Children, Youth and Families, said that the agency “has become a model for cities” all over the country. She urged the supes not to “take a chainsaw to the Charter.”

Doug Engmann, who has been president of both the Planning Commission and the Board of Appeals, said that at a time when Donald Trump is in the White House, “how can you demote the Human Rights Commission, the Commission on Children, Youth and Families, the Youth Commission and the Environment Commission? This is the wrong message.”

Sup. Shamann Walton took particular issue with a recommendation to move much of the authority over police discipline from the Police Commission to the chief.

Walton noted that:

Commissioners are appointed for their expertise in law, civil rights, and community advocacy. Stripping away the authority to hold officers accountable and placing it in the hands of the Police Chief in the name of efficiency, is a rollback of everything this community fought for.

Even the Police Officers Association opposes that change: Paul Chignell, a retired police captain who now works with the POA, said the current system is fair, and giving the chief full power would undermine the reforms of the past decade.

Sponsored link

The mayor wants the sole ability to hire and fire the police chief—which means all police discipline would ultimately rest with the city’s chief executive. Given the level of corruption, vindictiveness, and favoritism we have seen in that office in the past few decades, this seems like a terrible idea.

Christin Evans, a bookstore owner and longtime community activist, said the parallels between what’s happening in Washington DC and Mayor Lurie’s agenda are “frighteningly similar. The mayor is staging an executive power grab.”

Coalition on Homelessness Director Jennifer Friedenbach told the supes: “I was around before we had a Homeless Oversight Commission, when we had an advisory board, and it was a joke.”

The recommendations of the task force aren’t binding; the supes would have to draft a sweeping Charter amendment to implement some or all of them.

Sup. Rafael Mandelman announced that he is working with the City Attorney’s Office to draft legislation that would implement some, but not all, of the recommendations. That comes at a time when Mandelman is working with Lurie on a sweeping Charter package that would shift even more power to the mayor.

The supes are going to face a challenge here: The proposals for eliminating commissions are wildly unpopular with the people who work and serve on these panels, but popular with this mayor and the oligarchs. I didn’t hear a single speaker say they supported the proposals.

As Walton said at the end of the hearing:

Is this the San Francisco we want to be? Are we okay with more police deaths, losing resources to children and youth, losing youth voices, attacks on our arts? I really don’t think people understand the magnitude of this.

The Lurie agenda is not about “accountability:” I can’t imagine any of the Big Tech and Real Estate folks supporting any of these stronger-mayor measures if Aaron Peskin had been elected to that office.

It’s about eliminating progressive and community voices and consolidating power in the billionaire class.

We will see, once again, whose side the supes are on.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.
Sponsored link

Featured

Drama Masks: The curtain falls at SF Opera

Plus: A giant cucumber enchants in 'Manning' and 'African Stew' captures Black American and Black African divide.

Up against Palantir: A community forum confronts threats to privacy

Activists from around the country converged in Oakland, strategizing efforts to fight back against the corporate surveillance state

Best of the Bay 2026 Editors’ Pick: Golden Thread Productions

In the shadow of war, the company devoted to staging complex MENA stories once again finds its work all too relevant.

More by this author

Lurie’s tenant protection plan won’t really protect many tenants

But hey: At least he admit there's a crisis—caused to a great degree by his embrace of the AI industry

Want to slow down AI before it kills us? Maybe just cancel all the IPOs

Plus: How Lurie wants more control (and what it will mean) ... and can we please have a functional Sunshine Task Force? That's The Agenda for Sept. 13-20.

Jim Balderston, reporter. 1955-2026

Award-winning Bay Guardian journalist, he was the life of the party—and a very good friend.
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED