Sponsored link
Tuesday, December 30, 2025

Sponsored link

News + PoliticsLaborTeamsters picketing local Amazon center as part of national mobilization

Teamsters picketing local Amazon center as part of national mobilization

Strike demands union recognition for workers who the giant company says aren't technically employees.

-

Teamsters members have been picketing outside the Amazon distribution center near Industrial Street this week as part of a national campaign to demand union recognition for workers who the giant company argues are not even employees.

San Francisco Teamsters members demand Amazon sign a contract

The picket lines are designed to interfere with holiday deliveries: As Teamster President Sean O’Brien put it on X:

“If your package is delayed during the holidays, you can blame Amazon’s insatiable greed. We gave Amazon a clear deadline to come to the table and do right by our members. They ignored it. These greedy executives had every chance to show decency and respect for the people who make their obscene profits possible. Instead, they’ve pushed workers to the limit and now they’re paying the price. This strike is on them.”

From a San Francisco worker:

“What we’re doing is historic,” said Leah Pensler, a warehouse worker at DCK6 in San Francisco. “We are fighting against a vicious union-busting campaign, and we are going to win.”

The picket line in San Francisco wasn’t blocking drivers from going in or out, although everything slowed down as traffic backed up a bit. Still, they were having an impact: Several local officials, including Sup. Shamann Walton, showed up on the picket lines, and while the Chronicle gave the picket only modest coverage (and not on the front page), KQED did a lengthy piece. The action is getting significant national news media attention.

Some people on social media talked about boycotting Amazon, although the union hasn’t called for that action.

Amazon is, of course, a huge, very rich, and very profitable company, on target to make $60 billion this year. The company’s profit margin is more than 40 percent—astonishing in any retail operation, where margins are typically below 10 percent.

In other words, the company makes a ton of money, in part because its workers aren’t getting their share of the profits.

Here’s how it works: The drivers who deliver the packages are, for the most part, not technically Amazon employees. Instead, they work for a third-party vendor—so Amazon is refusing to recognize the union.

But according to the latest federal guidelines (which could be overturned by the Trump Administration) since Amazon directs the hours they work, and they wear Amazon uniforms, and drive trucks with the Amazon logo on them, the giant company needs to recognize and negotiate with the union.

That hasn’t happened in most places, including San Francisco, where the workers have no contract.

Just the money Amazon founder Jeff Bezos spent on his boat—paying essentially no taxes when he bought it—would be enough to give a lot of workers a nice raise.

The picket line is at Industrial Street and Jerrold Ave.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.
Sponsored link
Sponsored link

Featured

Screen Grabs: Our favorite films of 2025

Features and docs we couldn't shake in a very terrible political year. Plus: 'The Plague' adds one more to the list

For more than half a century, the progressives in SF have been right—and the developers wrong

We have murals and books and movies celebrating the opponents of demolitions like the I-Hotel and redevelopment. What will we look back on 20 years from now?

Comedowns are for losers: New Year’s Day parties 2026

Don't flag out once the ball drops: From Breakfast of Champions to Supper of Survivors, we've got your marathon revels covered.

More by this author

For more than half a century, the progressives in SF have been right—and the developers wrong

We have murals and books and movies celebrating the opponents of demolitions like the I-Hotel and redevelopment. What will we look back on 20 years from now?

PG&E offers more excuses, and will seek to delay and obfuscate over public power

Public power is cheaper, more reliable, and would make money for the city. Just look at the numbers

SF could move to take over PG&E’s system right now, if city officials had the political will

We don't need a new state bill or more hearings. The city could start the public power process immediately—and send a powerful message to the state
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED