Sponsored link
Saturday, March 29, 2025

Sponsored link

News + PoliticsCity HallFentanyl legislation is first test for mayor—and new supes

Fentanyl legislation is first test for mayor—and new supes

Lurie wants emergency powers but has offered no plan; will the conservative majority on the board go along?

-

The first test of the new Lurie Administration—and the new Board of Supes—started Tuesday, when the mayor introduced to the Board of Supes a package of legislation that he’s calling a “fentanyl emergency.”

It’s not actually emergency legislation, which as Joe Eskenazi at MissionLocal points out, would not stand up to legal scrutiny. It’s a set of bills that would allow the mayor to issue contracts and raise money from private donors without the supes approval. From the mayor’s press release:

First, it will unlock both previously allocated funding and new private and philanthropic funding. This action will allow department heads to prioritize initiatives related to drug use and homelessness, while bringing in much-needed resources specifically tied to these issues. Second, it will support faster, targeted hiring so departments can prioritize the most important roles and fill them quickly. Finally, it will accelerate the city’s process for partnering with nonprofits to provide core behavioral health services and address street conditions, through streamlined contracting processes and a time-bound 45-day process for Board of Supervisors action on larger contracts.

Interesting that he’s talking about faster hiring, since he just imposed a hiring freeze for everyone except public safety.

Sup. Shamann Walton says the mayor is asking for a lot of new power without a specific plan. Photo by Ebbe Roe Yovino Smith

In essence, Lurie wants the equivalent of emergency powers, without the official declaration of emergency.

He’s also called on the board to approve the package on an expedited basis.

That doesn’t mean it’s going through without the normal process, Board President Rafael Mandelman told me. Mandelman is going to assign it to a committee, which will schedule and hold a hearing on it. That might be the Rules Committee or the Budget Committee—and since Mandelman doesn’t expect to make new committee assignments until early next week, the package likely won’t start its way through the process before the last week in January or the first week in February.

The bills came up at the Tuesday board meeting during roll call, which is typically when supervisors announce their own proposals. Sup. Matt Dorsey announced his support for the package, which most of the supes haven’t seen yet, and so did Sup. Stephen Sherrill and Sup. Bilal Mahmood.

That’s already unusual: I can’t remember the last time that several supes announced their support for a bill during roll call. It suggests that they are already on board without listening to any testimony or asking any questions about what is a fairly complex legislative package.

Sponsored link

Help us save local journalism!

Every tax-deductible donation helps us grow to cover the issues that mean the most to our community. Become a 48 Hills Hero and support the only daily progressive news source in the Bay Area.

Sup. Shamann Walton told me he has some serious concerns about the legislation.

“He’s asking us to waive behested payments, the approval of contracts, and typically we would get a plan; we want to secure 1,500 beds, we want to do this and that, and here’s the package that will let us do it. But he didn’t tell us what he’s going to do with these powers. There isn’t a plan.”

Walton said he wanted to have further conversations about the package.

The press release lists four co-sponsors, Dorsey, Sherrill, Mahmood, and Sup. Joel Engardio. Mandelman told me that he’s inclined to vote for it with some changes; instead of the supes giving up approval authority, he said, the mayor should ask for a clear timeline for approvals that often drag out for months. If new D3 Sup. Danny Sauter goes along, that would be six votes.

It would also show that the new board is going to support the mayor’s public safety agenda, even when it makes little sense and isn’t backed up by a clear plan.

The hearings, and the vote, will set the tone for the next two years of City Hall politics.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.
Sponsored link

Featured

Poem: ‘Trans Power and Unity’

For Trans Day of Visibility, a meditation on the electric manifestations of trans power.

New study by Fed economists directly contradicts Yimby narrative on housing prices

Dramatic data suggests gentrification and income inequality are far more important than 'constraints' on development as the cause of high housing prices

OPINION: SF teachers fight to rebuild what Trump is tearing down

To save public education, start with fully staffed schools and fair pay for teachers

More by this author

New study by Fed economists directly contradicts Yimby narrative on housing prices

Dramatic data suggests gentrification and income inequality are far more important than 'constraints' on development as the cause of high housing prices

Another War on Drugs measure passes, with only two dissenting votes

Fielder and Chan oppose plan that has serious flaws and could lead to more deaths. 9-2 votes are becoming a pattern.

Will SF Democrats stand up to Trump—right here at home?

DCCC resolution calls for taxes on the local rich to save essential services; will the members of the billionaire-backed slate oppose it?
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED