Wednesday, July 1, 2026

OpinionLetters to the EditorLetters to the editor: What is the city getting by allowing housing...

Letters to the editor: What is the city getting by allowing housing demolitions?

Project by project, existing housing is destroyed for new high-priced units. Is this the way to solve the housing crisis?

-

To the editor:

Thanks for writing about the demolition at 237 Sanchez Street.

I think it is important to look at what the city is getting by granting this CUA.

Yes, per the staff report, there will be two units of rent-controlled housing replacing the single-family house and the unauthorized second unit.

The new proposal for 237 Sanchez

But these two units are basically one bedroom with some extra space without proper egress for a second bedroom, with one unit in the basement and one unit on the ground level.

Looking at the web ads the two existing units being “replaced” in this demolition looked quite nice and livable.

On the other hand, the other three units will be market-rate (de-controlled?) on the upper three floors with multiple bedrooms including one four-bedroom unit.

These three new units will be probably be very pricey, in a city with a ton of high-end market rate housing units already built and in the pipeline.

There should also be real concern about another Demolition on Thursday’s Planning Commission Agenda of a pair of San Francisco Edwardian Flats, that also has a UDU at 28-30 Day Street.  Previous tenants took buyouts for all three dwellings after the building was purchased in 2022.  

The new building will have three units total, two of which are a bit larger than the existing units with one very large two-level unit in a very glitzy-looking building.

I think the city needs to think seriously about this project-by-project attrition of existing sound housing with approving demolitions like these and what is actually being gained to “solve the housing crisis.”

Georgia Schuttish

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.
Sponsored link
Sponsored link

Featured

Percussion wizard Carlos Niño feels a sparkling transition

Improvisational player-composer has been everywhere lately, holding 'space' as a visionary jazz wave pushes through.

Politicized federal funding rule could spell disaster for California aid programs

OMB's breathtakingly broad proposal would subject disaster recovery, medical research, healthcare, more to ideological review.

Again, Jenkins takes dubious case to trial—and loses. It’s a disturbing pattern

A felony charge over $54 worth of underpants (that weren't even stolen). This is what the current DA is doing to clog the courts

More by this author

Again, Jenkins takes dubious case to trial—and loses. It’s a disturbing pattern

A felony charge over $54 worth of underpants (that weren't even stolen). This is what the current DA is doing to clog the courts

A Friday police riot and a glorious peaceful Sunday for Pride…

... Plus: Why is an attack on affordable housing happening the day before the July 4 weekend—and the Giants players and Sen. Hawley need to go back to Bible School. That's The Agenda for June 28-July 5

Supes reject $28 million in Lurie budget cuts

Agreement restores funding for critical services—but why was this so hard?

You might also likeRELATED