Sponsored link
Thursday, April 18, 2024

Sponsored link

Tagged with: CEQA

Lots of housing laws. Not much housing

Hearing, data show how the state's 'streamlining' supply-side approach is failing.

This is the state of housing policy in SF in 2023

Planners say environmental law doesn't matter, and supes approve a project almost everyone hates, all to deal with state Sen. Scott Wiener's rules—and Breed wants to make it worse

Et Tu, Mother Jones?

Once a storied left-wing publication, the magazine is now fallen into the neoliberal Yimby camp—and the editor refuses to talk to us about it.

Is gentrification an environmental impact?

The battle over People’s Park has been raging since I was in sixth grade, and we could spend a huge amount of time talking...

New study shows private market can’t and won’t create workforce housing in SF

The city's own study shows that the entire Yimby narrative is based on a fundamental economic falsehood.

The SoMa project that created a furor in the Assembly race is back again

Planning is trying again on 469 Stevenson, but the EIR appeal didn't delay a project that isn't going to be built any time soon anyway. Oh, and Yimby Law just lost.

Should shopping malls become housing? Yes—but only if the state does it right

The Legislature has responded to affordable-housing developers. But there's a lot of unfinished work to protect vulnerable communities.

Why CEQA matters

Blaming CEQA for California’s problems is easier than wrestling with the root causes of challenges like housing affordability and access to higher education

Scathing new city report repudiates Lee, Breed policies on Uber, Lyft

Planners say TNCs have caused terrible problems because the city didn't regulate them. Plus, on housing: It's capitalism, stupid.

Bogus group-housing plan approved—sort of

In a sign of how messed up state law has become, Supes allow five-unit building that developer says is too small.