Sponsored link
Monday, May 27, 2024

Sponsored link

News + PoliticsElectionsThe district gerrymander is back—and looks like the final supes map

The district gerrymander is back—and looks like the final supes map

A map the community could live with is rejected, and replaced with one that favors conservatives and allies of the mayor.

-

It became clear about half an hour into the Redistricting Task Force meeting Thursday that the deal was done, and a badly gerrymandered map designed to damage progressive voting power was going to be approved.

The move was quick, stunning, and for a lot of the activists in the room, unexpected.

Last week the Task Force agreed to put a final map on the table that would have satisfied most of the hundreds of activists who had been showing up, day after day, to testify in favor of some version of a map the community could get behind.

This appears to be the final map for the next ten years.

That map was approved on a 5-4 vote, with the chair, Rev. Arnold Townsend, casting the swing vote. All of the mayor’s appointees except Townsend and all but one of the Elections Commission appointees voted no.

It wasn’t perfect, but to most of the organizers, it was a good start.

Right away at Thursday’s meeting, Task Force member Michelle Pierce made a motion to adopt that version, known as Map 7, as a starting point for the final, final version.

After a bit of discussion, the clerk called the roll. The vote to reject Map 7 and go back to the severe gerrymander was 5-4; Townsend switched sides.

Then Townsend immediately moved to shift Potrero Hill back into D10—a huge issue for the Black community. That was approved on a 5-4 vote, with Townsend in favor.

So Townsend agreed to change one aspect of a terrible map—and then voted not to change the rest.

The final map is going to be approved and can’t be changed. It severs the Tenderloin from Soma; it puts Seacliff in District 1; if moves District 4 south. It does a lot of what the real-estate industry and the mayor’s allies publicly said the want: A shift away from progressive voting power.

The process, to be polite, has been a mess. Every previous redistricting Task Force reached consensus on the lines. This one has been split 5-4 on every major decision. The meetings have gone until 3am; the overwhelming comments of the community have been rejected, repeatedly.

This is how backroom political power works in the administration of Mayor London Breed. And unless someone sues or put a Charter Amendment on the ballot to change it, this will be the district map for the next ten years.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.

Featured

Milk Club debate shows how the candidates for mayor are framing the issues

Three moving to the right, one looking for a lane, and one taking a strong progressive stance.

3 must-see shows from SFJAZZ’s smoking summer schedule

The venue has 90+ concerts in the wings over the next three months—check out this hot trio of picks.

Reclaiming homes, from LA to Sacramento

Solutions driven by the unhoused are constantly under attack.

More by this author

Milk Club debate shows how the candidates for mayor are framing the issues

Three moving to the right, one looking for a lane, and one taking a strong progressive stance.

Support for public power in SF is growing, even—finally—in the news media

ABC News segment focuses on the Raker Act Scandal; will the mayoral candidates all support the next step? And what's up with Matt Haney?

The embarrassment of the billionaires

Plus: What are the city's priorities, and will short-term thinking dominate the budget debate? That's The Agenda for May 19-26
Sponsored link
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED