Sponsored link
Wednesday, March 29, 2023

Sponsored link

News + PoliticsBusiness + TechReport shows that big local tech companies give nothing back to the...

Report shows that big local tech companies give nothing back to the community

Business Times scorecard shows why corporate philanthropy in 2021 is a complete and utter failure.


I am not in general a big fan of corporate philanthropy. Everything about the model is wrong; instead of paying taxes, company executives who are elected by nobody and not accountable to the public get to decide where the money goes. All too often, it’s just a corporate PR strategy to defuse community anger.

But I still read the San Francisco Business Times special section this week on how supposedly wonderful our local oligarchs are at sharing the wealth. From the intro by Publisher Mary Huss:

Our region is blessed with generous corporate citizens that provide needed cash, economic and political influence, and a workforce that mobilizes to do good.

Then, as it always does (and the information is often useful) the BT published a list of the top corporate philanthropists in the Bay Area, listed by the amount they give to charity.

It’s absolutely stunning.

Google HQ: The company gives so little to the community. Wikimedia Commons image.

Let’s start with the Number Two donor, Google. The company gave $57.7 million to Bay Area charities in 2021. Sounds like a lot of money.

Except that Google’s revenue that year was $257 billion, and its profit was $91 billion.

So as a percentage of profit, Google donated … such a small number that my calculator almost can’t handle it. We’re talking 0.06 percent, an amount so low that you can’t actually measure it in any standard economic model.

Genentech hasn’t reported its profits, but its revenue in 2021 was $24.6 billion. To local charity: $10.21 million. That’s 0.04 percent.

Cisco Systems: $13 billion profit, $28 million in charity. 0.2 percent.

Intel: $22 billion in profits, $9.3 million in local charity. 0.04 percent.

Oracle: $4 billion in profits, $2.96 in local charity, 0.05 percent.

Yelp, $34 million in profits, $221,000 in local charity, that’s 0.0003 percent.

The list goes on and on and on.

Some of the big local folks that the city has given great benefits to, like Twitter, Airbnb, Uber, and Lyft, aren’t even on the list of the Top 100, meaning they have donated less than $28,000 (the cutoff) to charity in 2021.


Let’s imagine for a moment that these companies all donated five percent of their profits (that’s a pretty modest number) to needy individuals and organizations. The top six companies I listed about would give almost $12 billion to local charities.

Or imagine they actually paid reasonable corporate taxes, say, 40 percent. That would be around $60 billion in revenue for public needs (enough, for example, to solve the entire homeless and affordable housing crisis in the state of California).

These are not “generous corporate citizens.” They are giving essentially nothing back to the communities that made their riches possible.

This is why “corporate philanthropy” is a giant fail.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.

Top reads

Long COVID has reached the ‘Russian Roulette’ stage in the US

As the nation seeks to return to a maskless, congregate 'normal,' the brutal virus is still out there, and repeated infections seem linked to longterm health problems.

Depeche Mode brings San Jose to its feet, then to tears

Memories of keyboardist Andrew Fletcher hung in the air—but hope for group's future did, too.

Good Taste: Grazing on Clement Street

Make a day out of hitting the old-school bakeries, mom and pop restaurants, and a charming new Italian pasta shop.

More by this author

Suddenly, Wiener is a climate champion (and he’s running for Congress)

A strange mailer looks like the kickoff of the Wiener campaign for Pelosi's seat.

Supes hearing misses the point on homelessness

Mandelman seeks radical change in policy away from permanent housing while poverty and neoliberal capitalism take a back seat.

SF has no program in place to prevent SRO evictions from creating homelessness

Hearing shows a gap that puts people who were housed back on the streets.
Sponsored link
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED