Sponsored link
Friday, July 11, 2025

Sponsored link

News + PoliticsSheriff's Oversight Board could ban members from speaking to the news media

Sheriff’s Oversight Board could ban members from speaking to the news media

Unusual gag order is a 'huge problem' and probably unconstitutional.

-

The new civilian board appointed to oversee complaints against the San Francisco Sheriff’s Office is considering a sweeping policy that would prevent members from talking to the news media on a wide range of issues.

Wikimedia Commons image

The policy, First Amendment advocates say, is not only bad policy but quite possible unconstitutional.

The policy states:

Sheriff’s Department Oversight Board (SDOB) Members shall not comment to the media on issues not voted upon and approved or rejected by the Board.

That means, potentially, that board members would be barred from discussing with reporters general issues involving Sheriff’s Department oversight and would prevent them from discussing items that are on an upcoming agenda.

“I’ve never heard of such a thing,” David Loy, legal director for the California First Amendment Coalition, told me. “It’s a huge problem, and there’s a very good chance it’s unconstitutional.”

Loy said that as a matter of policy, the gag order would undermine the idea of government transparency, and would also be a type of discrimination against the news media.

“You can talk to 20 of your friends about issues, but you can’t talk to the media? That’s a huge problem,” he said.

The policy also applies to social media:

Members shall not engage in social media discourse where an individual member’s opinion may be misconstrued to represent the position of SDOB as a whole. Members should also be mindful that any hint about a particular position on a pending vote could be a violation of the Brown Act or Sunshine Ordinance.

That’s a pretty broad statement; an opinion “may be misconstrued” could apply to almost anything anyone posts on social media. And an individual member taking a stand on a pending issue is by no means a violation of the Brown Act of Sunshine Ordinance. If it were, members of the Board of Supervisors, who regularly say they are for or against upcoming legislative proposals, would be in violation all the time.

The Brown Act and Sunshine Ordinance say that members can’t meet in advance of a hearing behind the scenes and decide what to do. But it has no impact on what an individual member can say.

The policy was on the agenda for the Feb. 3 meeting, but has been continued to March 3. If it passes, it could set a terrible precedent for local agencies.

I will keep you posted.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.
Sponsored link
Sponsored link

Featured

Britney blackout: Author Jeff Weiss relives the ’00s pop culture cataclysm

Music journalist's gonzo new book 'Waiting for Britney Spears' dives into the tabloid-strewn wreck of the schlocky decade.

Under the Stars: Madlib’s sonic crystal ball spins again

Plus: Kendra Morris scores a reggae-tinged 'Flat Tire,' Jay Som rocks back with 'Float,' Directions in Stereo dips into the wax stacks

Good Taste: An obsessive early guide to the Outside Lands food multiverse

Fun bevs, free samples, fries as meals, super splurges, and more: It’s not too soon to plan your festival menu.

More by this author

Will supes oust one of the most effective members of the Homeless Oversight Commission?

And what does this say about the mayor and the board changing policy on Prop C and 'housing first?'

Supes to vote on Billionaire Budget deal amid protests over housing money

Plus: A crackdown on RV parking that will make more families homeless, and will the Police Commission do a real national search for the next chief? That's The Agenda for July 6-13

Wiener-Newsom CEQA ‘reform’ is a dangerous fraud

Lithium battery factories without environmental review. Miami Beach development along the coast. And it's not going to make housing more affordable
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED