Sponsored link
Thursday, October 1, 2026

Sponsored link

News + PoliticsTransportationCPUC delays decision on robotaxis in SF; drivers ask for loan repayment

CPUC delays decision on robotaxis in SF; drivers ask for loan repayment

Why not make Waymo put up a tiny fraction of its wealth to help the people whose livelihoods will be destroyed?

-

For reasons that are not clear to anyone, the California Public Utilities Commission has delayed for a month consideration of an application to allow Waymo to operate robot taxis in San Francisco.

That means the rally to protest the expected action is also delayed while the CPUC further studies the issue.

That’s probably good news for the cab drivers; the agency staff strongly recommended approving the permit, which would have allowed robotaxis to operate everywhere in the city, 24 hours a day seven days a week.

Waymo driverless car on California Street. Image: Dietmar Rabich / Wikimedia Commons / “San Francisco (CA, USA), California Street, autonomes Fahrzeug (Waymo) — 2022 — 2925” / CC BY-SA 4.0

So if at least one commission member, Genevieve Shiroma, who heads the Transportation Network Company oversight at the agency, wants more time to review the application and all of the letters and comments, many of them in opposition, the robocabs may be off the fast track. For the moment.

The hearing will now happen August 10.

A couple of the cab drivers who are on the hook for $250,000 loans for medallions the city sold them just before allowing Uber and Lyft to illegally devastate the cab business have a suggestion:

If Waymo and Cruise, both owned by giant corporations, want to take over the cab business with driverless cars, first they should buy out the existing medallion holders. There are, according to the SFMTA, 424 people who have purchased medallions. That’s $106 million. Waymo, owned by Alphabet, is now valued at $30 billion. (The company is already working with Uber to get rid of Uber drivers and is working on robodrivers for long-haul trucking.)

Paying off the drivers in SF would cost about three-tenths of one percent of Waymo’s value, chump change to Alphabet.

It would also set an important precedent: When new technology destroys many existing jobs and creates great wealth for a very few, a tech company should have some responsibility for sharing some of that wealth with the people whose livelihoods have been ruined in the process.

We could do that by taxing the great wealth and redistributing it. But we could also, as a starting point, make Waymo pay off the taxi medallion loans.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. 

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.
Sponsored link

Featured

Portola 2026 review: The pops, the flops, the drops

The raccoon tanked and the chicken was hidden, but the massive dance music fest delivered with Despacio, Four Tet, Robyn, and more.

The mayor’s Big Lie on Prop. D

The measure doesn't stop special interests from writing laws. It does the opposite.

Drama Masks: A queen who brings chills—and a carry-on

SF Opera's 'Mary, Queen of Scots' packs the puffy jackets, while ACT's 'North by Northwest' flies by the seat of its pants.

More by this author

The mayor’s Big Lie on Prop. D

The measure doesn't stop special interests from writing laws. It does the opposite.

Why is the demolition of historic buildings not a bigger issue in the D8 supe race?

Who's afraid of the Yimbys who want to call the Castro a "theme park?"

LA is taxing mansions to building affordable housing. Why is Lurie opposing a similar plan?

Plus: Supes to confront jail conditions ... and have the Yimbys crossed a line in the Castro?
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED