Sponsored link
Tuesday, September 8, 2026

Sponsored link

News + PoliticsRecall Boudin ad features paid campaign staffer—and nobody else

Recall Boudin ad features paid campaign staffer—and nobody else

Flier says "leading Democrats" are unhappy with the DA—but the only person they present makes $16,000 a month working for the recall campaign.

-

The campaign to recall District Attorney Chesa Boudin has a new mailer out, featuring Andrea Shorter. She’s on the front of the four-page flier, and again in a full-page photo on the inside. She is described as a “victim’s rights advocate.”

She is the only person mentioned in the mailer, although it talks about “leading San Francisco Democrats.”

Nowhere in the mailer does it mention that Shorter is a paid recall staffer, earning $16,000 a month, according to Ethics Commission filings.

The missing info: Shorter is a paid recall campaign staffer.

In other words: A person who has been hired (at a high salary) to advocate for the recall is also featured as the one and only “leading Democrat” on a recall mailer.

That’s a bit of a problem, since state law requires that campaign ads featuring paid spokespeople acknowledge that they are getting paid:

An advertisement paid for by a committee described in paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) shall include a disclosure statement stating “(spokesperson’s name) is being paid by this campaign or its donors” in highly visible font shown continuously if the advertisement consists of printed or televised material, or spoken in a clearly audible format if the advertisement is a radio broadcast or telephonic message.  If the advertisement is a television or video advertisement, the statement shall be shown continuously, except when the disclosure statement required by Section 84504.1 is being shown.

The ad doesn’t mention that the San Francisco Democratic Party opposes the recall. In fact, if you go to the recall website, there are very few “leading Democrats” anywhere, except for Mary Jung, a former party chair who is a real-estate lobbyist and it also directly involved as treasurer of the campaign.

On one of the pages of the mailer states that Boudin “dismissed 40 percent of cases” in 2020, compared to the Alameda County district attorney, who only dismissed 11 percent.

The source: The Marina Times, which has been after Boudin from the start. The Times says Boudin tried only 23 cases (out of about 6,300) while Alameda County tried more than 2,300.

But as Joe Eskenazi at Mission Local noted, the Alameda County numbers in the Marina Times were just wrong:

The Alameda County DA’s office is confused by the claim it tried 2,300 cases in 2020. That would require empaneling 9+ juries a day, during a pandemic. ADA’s Office tells me that last year it had 26 felony jury trials and 22 misdemeanor jury trial verdicts. Total: 48.

The lack of factual accuracy is common in political mailers, although hardly anyone in the news media bothers to fact check them.

But there’s a larger message here:

If the best that the recall campaign can do is use a paid staffer as their spokesperson on a mailer, it suggests the recall folks don’t have a very deep field of people who are credible to local voters.

Oh, and let’s not forget that the mailer was paid for with money from William Obendorf, who is a big supporter of Trump’s allies.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.
Sponsored link

Featured

Fall Arts Preview: 8 visual art shows you simply must see

Sandow Birk's carceral Californian landscapes, Nexus Black Art Week's stunning breadth, Ha Chong-Hyun's singular style...

Fall Arts Preview: 10 live music shows to ring in autumn ears

Martin Luther McCoy, Kofy Brown, Jack White, Erykah Badu and The Alchemist—Bay 'summer' is back.

Why is SF encouraging a notorious landlord to build luxury housing in the Lower Haight?

Giant, predatory Greystar Parntners is developing 400 Divis. Mahmood and the Yimbys are cheering

More by this author

Lurie and Mamdani could not be more different

Plus: Big Tech money moves into D10 .... and will the Planning Commission approve a project without knowing what it is? That's The Agenda for Sept. 7-14

SFPD drone spying policy faces backlash

Community groups, commission members dubious about letting cops use surveillance technology without more guardrails

Let’s just say it: The SF Democratic Party has become a total embarrassment

A progressive city has an incompetent, right-wing clown show controlling the local party
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED