Tuesday, January 19, 2021
News + Politics Housing Supes save hotel program -- with a catch

Supes save hotel program — with a catch

Mandleman insists that new arrivals to the rooms can be evicted any time the funding runs out -- even if there's not place to go.


The Board of Supes agreed unanimously Tuesday to keep the city’s shelter-in-place hotels open – but only after a compromise that will prevent some new hotel residents from any guarantee they won’t be sent back to the streets.

Plenty of people are still on the streets during COIVD, while the mayor wants to close down hotels rooms.

The emergency measure would ensure that people currently living in the hotel rooms could keep their homes until the city can demonstrate that they have been moved into acceptable permanent housing.

The key element, however, is that sponsors wanted to keep the 2,300 hotel rooms open and available to anyone who is currently unhoused. The rooms are now earmarked for people with high COVID risk.

As the Mayor’s Office moves existing residents into permanent supportive housing – and there are now, the city says, about 600 units available – those hotel rooms would have simple shut down.

But under the new ordinance, the city has to keep them open and allow other unhoused people to get off the streets.

By many medical accounts, just about everyone living on the streets is by definition at high risk for COVID.

The sticking point: Sup. Rafael Mandelman wouldn’t vote for the measure unless it allowed the city to evict those new residents even if there’s no housing for them.

That, he said, was a financial decision: If the federal government stops paying for 85 percent of the cost of the rooms, the city, Mandelman said, won’t be able to afford the millions of dollars in costs.

So at that point – and we don’t know when or if it will happen – the city will have to either cover the cost out of the General Fund or shut down the program. And there won’t be enough available housing for everyone, so some would wind up back on the streets.

Keeping the hotel rooms open, Mandelman said in committee, “might be the moral and humane thing to do, but it’s a $70 million to $100 million project.”

Sup. Matt Haney, who sponsored the bill, said that the SIP hotel program “has provided shelter, meals, and safety to 2,300 people. It has a positive stabilizing effect, and it’s cost-efficient.”

Sup. Hillary Ronen noted that “tonight hundreds of people are sleeping on the streets in my district, and I want to know that if there is someone moved out, there is a hotel room for them.”

Mandelman insisted that the rehousing provisions can’t apply to currently unhoused residents who move into rooms vacated by a person with high COVID risk. “I am grateful that we were able to address my concerns,” he said.

The legislation has to be renewed every 60 days, so it’s not a long-term program.

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.


  1. Thanks David. I remember a time when residents of shelters could be thrown out if they were caught charging their cell phone. Fortunately, that was changed.

  2. I understand our District 8 Supervisor Rafael Mandelman’s financial reasoning but I am also troubled by it. It is like saying that earlier unhoused clients are entitled to certain housing protections but more recent ones are not. While there may not be the money available to house all initially, we should at minimum try accommodate all homeless residents – even if this means temporarily setting them up in RV lots or Safe Sleeping Villages. These should have full access to rest rooms, showers, cell phone charging stations and electric heaters during winter. Anything less is inhumane.

    David Elliott Lewis, San Francisco.

  3. So when that cwafty wascawl Bweed figures out a way to do an end run around this ordinance aside from punching fist through straw hat, what will the supes do?

More by this author

Bay View editor may take legal action against private prison company

Keith Malik Washington charges that the Federal Bureau of Prisons and the Geo Group retaliated after he contacted a reporter about a COVID outbreak in a halfway house.

Chron rejects comments critical of Boudin editorial

Comments supporting the DA don't seem to violate the paper's standards; why were they blocked?

UCSF deal is unenforceable

And the housing component is far less than the city needs.

COVID outbreak — and media crackdown — at private halfway house in Tenderloin

Center run by private prison contractor on lockdown, and resident punished for contacting the news media about it.

Supes to ask mayor about corruption

Plus: Hearing on UCSF's hospital expansion plans and the new committee lineup: That's The Agenda for Jan 11-18.

You might also likeRELATED