Sponsored link
Thursday, February 29, 2024

Sponsored link

News + PoliticsHousingNow SF urged to lower affordable-housing levels in market-rate projects

Now SF urged to lower affordable-housing levels in market-rate projects

The mayor's housing policies make less and less sense the more you look into them.

-

Just as Mayor London Breed is admitting that the city can’t meet its affordable-housing mandates under state law, the city controller is suggesting that San Francisco reduce the level of below-market housing that for-profit developers are required to build.

In a report today, the controller suggested that the city cut the inclusionary affordable requirement almost in half, to just 12 to 16 percent. The current requirements are 21.5 to 23.5 percent, depending on whether the developers is building apartments or condos.

Affordable housing is a key part of the Housing Element, but the process keeps going backward.

The report suggests that the lower rates stay in effect until 2026—and that the city should consider applying the lower rates to projects that have already been approved but are not under construction.

The reason: With the current affordability levels, most construction projects in the city are “not feasible.”

But wait: Even with the cuts, a lot of projects still won’t “pencil out.”

High-rise condominium prototypes (generally above 8 stories), and all apartment prototypes, would not be feasible at these inclusionary levels. Some low- and midrise condominium prototypes (below 8 stories) should be feasible with these reduced requirements. Within these recommended ranges, a greater proportion of individual low-rise condominium projects are likely to be feasible than would be the case for mid-rise condominium projects. Setting requirements in the lower portion of the recommended ranges would increase the ultimate share of mid-rise projects that are likely to be feasible.

So if we cut affordable housing in half, we might get some more small high-end condo projects, which will do nothing for the city’s affordability crisis. And not that many will get built anyway.

Let’s say the city cut the affordability requirements for all of the roughly 45,000 units that are now approved but haven’t broken ground. That means somewhere between 5,400 and 7,200 affordable units would be built, along with somewhere between 37,000 and 39,000 market-rate units.

The Housing Element calls for the city to permit and encourage construction of some 84,000 housing units, and 46,000 of them are supposed to be affordable. That’s 54 percent affordable housing.

With the controller’s estimate, we’re looking at less that 30 percent of that.

Nonprofits working with city subsidies would have to provide 38,000 new units in the next five years, at a cost of some $19 billion (or more, if we cut the inclusionary).

Meanwhile, there’s conclusive evidence that at anything less that about 40 percent affordability, market-rate housing makes the crisis worse.

The more you look into this, the less sense it makes.

Sort of like modern late-stage Capitalism, which is really the root of the housing crisis.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.

Featured

City wastes millions on contracts with big out-of-town companies, report shows

More than $200 million goes for services city workers could provide much, much cheaper.

Get loud for the library! Submit to SFPL’s ‘Bay Beats’

The streaming site returns with a second submission period, March to May. Artists residing in Bay Area counties are invited to send in tunes

SF promised a lot of affordable housing—but community leaders say it won’t happen

New report has lots of 'creative' ideas, but there's nowhere near enough funding to meet the state mandated goals—and the Mayor's Office admits it.

More by this author

City wastes millions on contracts with big out-of-town companies, report shows

More than $200 million goes for services city workers could provide much, much cheaper.

SF promised a lot of affordable housing—but community leaders say it won’t happen

New report has lots of 'creative' ideas, but there's nowhere near enough funding to meet the state mandated goals—and the Mayor's Office admits it.

Prop. C won’t produce much housing—but could cost the city a lot of money

Breed's plan is probably worthless, city economist says—but if it works, it will cost millions.
Sponsored link
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED