Sponsored link
Wednesday, May 22, 2024

Sponsored link

News + PoliticsHousingBreed admits that the city's Housing Element is destined to fail

Breed admits that the city’s Housing Element is destined to fail

Mayor says, for the first time, that she has no plan to deliver on the state mandates for local affordable housing.

-

Mayor London Breed said today that she doesn’t expect the city to meet its affordable housing goals in a timely fashion because there’s not enough funding.

The comment came in response to a question from Sup. Myrna Melgar, who asked how the city plans to implement the part of the Housing Element that calls for 46,000 new units of affordable housing. That, the city’s own data shows, will cost about $19 billion.

Breed praised the new Housing Element—then said there’s no way to pay for its affordable housing elements.

Her comment confirmed what many housing advocates feared: The Housing Element will make it easier for profit-seeking developers to build market-rate housing, but will do little or nothing to help the city reaches its affordable-housing goals.

Melgar during monthly Question Time noted that the state’s goal, reflected in the Housing Element, can’t be reached without “a vast increase in affordable-housing funding” and an increase in the capacity of nonprofit affordable-housing developers.

Sup. Myrna Melgar pressed the mayor: Where is the affordable housing? Photo by Ebbe Roe Yovino-Smith

“What is the direction from your office to operationalize the need for high production of affordable housing?” she asked.

Breed first talked about the $42 million the city just won in federal funding, and the $1.1 billion in bonds that the voters have approved in past years.

She then said that the city “can’t rely on 100 percent government funded affordable housing,” and argued that inclusionary housing built as part of market-rate projects was also a part of the answer (although she and others now want to reduce that requirement).

But Melgar pressed: What is the plan to build the required 46,000 units?

Breed: “I’m not going to say we are going to be able to deliver [that] in a timely manner, because of the cost.”

In other words: We don’t have $19 billion, there’s no way to get it, so we are just going to fail in our affordable-housing goals.

This is the first time I have ever heard the mayor of San Francisco admit that her Planning Department’s Housing Element—which she praised earlier in the board session—is, in fact, a farce.

The supes also rejected a move by Sup. Rafael Mandelman to end remote public comment, but put off final rules for another month. Sup. Matt Dorsey amended Mandelman’s legislation to continue remote comment until April, to give the board and the clerk a chance to change the board’s rules.

The board voted, unanimously, to approve a resolution opposing the Congressional vote condemning “Socialism.” At last week’s meeting, Sup. Joel Engardio refused to provide the 11th vote needed for approval without committee reference, saying that the supes shouldn’t be taking on national issues—but the red-baiting attacks on Socialism are happening here in San Francisco, too. In fact, the mayor opposed moving municipal elections to presidential-election years because, she said, it was a Socialist plot. Engardio also said, correctly, that Rep. Nancy Pelosi had voted for the House resolution, and he didn’t want to directly criticize her.

He came around after Sup. Dean Preston, who authored the resolution, made a few minor changes.

Dozens of speakers showed up, or called in, to support Sup. Hillary Ronen’s resolution affirming San Francisco’s Sanctuary City status and challenging the Biden Administration and ICE. Once again, Sup. Matt Dorsey, who wants the city to help deport Fentanyl dealers, voted No. But at this point, the resolution needed only eight votes to pass, so the board approved it over his objection.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.

Featured

Support for public power in SF is growing, even—finally—in the news media

ABC News segment focuses on the Raker Act Scandal; will the mayoral candidates all support the next step? And what's up with Matt Haney?

Screen Grabs: Faster, faster, ‘Furiosa’!

Dazzling action sequences in latest 'Mad Max'—but to what end? Plus: William Lustig's subterranean budgetary gems.

Live Shots: Idles tore down Fox Theater with colossal post-punk energy

The UK quintet, known for its outspoken politics and cranking metal jams, came to support new album 'TANGK'

More by this author

Support for public power in SF is growing, even—finally—in the news media

ABC News segment focuses on the Raker Act Scandal; will the mayoral candidates all support the next step? And what's up with Matt Haney?

The embarrassment of the billionaires

Plus: What are the city's priorities, and will short-term thinking dominate the budget debate? That's The Agenda for May 19-26

The big billionaire-backed mayoral debate is becoming the Losers Show

Breed won't go. Peskin won't go. Lurie might not go. Here's what that means for the mayor's race.
Sponsored link
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED