Sponsored link
Friday, April 26, 2024

Sponsored link

UncategorizedFree drinks for Christensen's friends

Free drinks for Christensen’s friends

Fundraiser at House of Shields attracts opponents of minimum wage, Healthy San Francisco

Good stuff, at $85 a shot
Good stuff, at $85 a shot

By Tim Redmond

APRIL 2, 2015 – I’m sorry I missed the fundraiser for Julie Christensen at the House of Shields. Sounded like a great event, what with party-goers like Gwyneth Borden of the Golden Gate Restaurant Association, which opposed the city’s minimum wage law and sued to block Healthy San Francisco.

Nice company.

In fact, Borden is convinced that her candidate is going to face something “ugly” – the prospect of voting on controversial legislation.

“This is going to be an ugly, ugly race. (Peskin) is going to have his allies on the Board of Supervisors put forth controversial things to try to make (Christensen) look bad in the district. We are going to have to be strong for Julie,” Borden said.

Wait: Isn’t that what being a supervisor is about? I mean, voting on legislation? Peskin has a long record of votes on controversial legislation, and on some of those votes I bitterly disagreed with him. But agree or disagree, you don’t have to look far to see where he stood, in the course of eight years on the board.

Christensen at this point has almost no record. So of course she’s going to have to vote on issues, and some of them won’t be easy. If that’s a problem for her, she’s in the wrong line of work.

But here’s what’s interesting about what would otherwise be a typical event:

Leary offered an open bar to Christensen’s supporters, but he did have one favor to ask: “There is one whiskey that I would prefer you not touch, which is the Pappy Van Winkle 15 Year Reserve. I’d much rather sell that to a 27-year-old senior Yelp or Twitter executive.”

That’s because a shot costs $85.

An open bar? On the bar owner? Well, the House of Shields can’t offer free drinks to Christensen supporters at a fundraiser, because free drinks count as a campaign contribution, and the restaurant is a corporation, and corporations can’t make contributions to candidates for supervisor. I suppose if Leary is going to personally cover the tab, out of his own pocket, that’s legit – as long as it doesn’t exceed $500, at which point it would bust the contribution limit.

Wouldn’t take too many $85 shots to hit $500.

I left messages for Leary at his various bars and restaurants, and I sent him an email with my questions, but haven’t heard back. I called Maureen Erwin, the political consultant doing the Christensen campaign, and she agreed with my analysis.

“I wasn’t at the event, but if it exceeded $500, the campaign will have to pay for it,” she said. How would we know how much Leary served and how he is going to reimburse the restaurant? “I’m sure he has some way of keeping track.”

 

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.

Sponsored link

Featured

Supes rent-relief program saved 20,000 people from eviction during the pandemic

New city report shows how taxing the rich to help low-income renters is highly effective.

Nothing’s gonna rain on ‘Funny Girl’ Katerina McCrimmon’s SF parade

“I've always been fighting to make it this far," says the dynamo Fanny Brice with Miami roots and plenty of chutzpah.

Supes put a hold on Breed’s Treasure Island developer bailout plan

Mayor's Office, developers now have to figure out how to move forward with a deeply troubled project

More by this author

Supreme Court hears critical case on homeless policy (SF wants to legalize sweeps) …

... Plus: Is the SF Zoo really capable of hosting pandas, and is the city ready to start letting developers off the hook for the impacts their projects create? That's The Agenda for April 24-31

Is protesting in traffic ‘false imprisonment?’

Then what about Waymo blocking a highway entrance ramp?

New conservative DCCC members will face vote on critical labor issues

Will the 'moderate' majority elected with tech money support bills that regulate AI, robotaxis, and robotrucks?
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED