Sponsored link
Sunday, December 28, 2025

Sponsored link

News + PoliticsNo surprise—Boudin recall will be on the June ballot

No surprise—Boudin recall will be on the June ballot

If you spend $1.4 million, you can qualify almost anything—but this will be a big test for the integrity of elections and SF's political leadership.

-

To the surprise of nobody, the supporters of the effort to recall Chesa Boudin turned in enough signatures to put the issue on the June 7 ballot.

If you spend enough money on paid signature-gatherers, who use all kinds of dubious practices, you can qualify almost anything these days.

Chesa Boudin won the election. Now his opponents want a do-over.

“After spending $1.4 million, and using shady and misleading tactics, it’s no surprise that this radical recall has bought its way onto the ballot,” said Julie Edwards, a spokesperson for the campaign against the recall.

Now we will see a critical test of local politics.

Seven of the 11 supes have signed on to oppose the recall. Sup. Myrna Melgar isn’t on the website, but she told me she opposes the recall on principle. So has Assemblymember Phil Ting.

Assemblymember David Chiu didn’t take a position on the recall, and is now the city attorney. Mayor Breed has said nothing.

The recall will be paired with the traditional June primary, which could, conceivably, be the third election for Chiu’s seat.

The first attempt to recall Boudin, led by Republican Richie Greenberg, didn’t qualify. That effort relied on volunteer signature gathering.

This time around, the effort is directed and run by people who were supporters of Breed’s DA candidate, Suzy Loftus, who lost to Boudin. It’s not hard to see this as an effort to run a do-over, in the wake of a global pandemic, when crime patterns changed all over the country and courtrooms were closed so prosecutions were stalled.

This recall fervor—in this case, clearly driven by right-wing opposition to Boudin’s progressive policies—has the potential to change local politics. If you lose a race in which contributions are limited to $500, you can just go and file a recall, where contributions are unlimited, and let big money drive the election—and in San Francisco, give the mayor a chance to replace the elected candidate.

How much of the local political establishment will either go along with this or duck? Will the news media see this as a change for the mayor to replace someone who beat her candidate with the person she wants in the job?

The stakes in this campaign are huge, and go beyond Boudin.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.
Sponsored link
Sponsored link

Featured

PG&E offers more excuses, and will seek to delay and obfuscate over public power

Public power is cheaper, more reliable, and would make money for the city. Just look at the numbers

Drama Masks: Year on Stage 2025, part 1—the not-so-great stuff

A year of devastating cuts, wild uncertainty, and unexpected departures left its mark on the SF scene.

Under the Stars: Noise Pop’s latest scores? Jay Som, Giraffage, CupcakKe, Open Mike Eagle…

Plus: A perfect, purple way to spend NYE, RIP Jellybean Johnson of the Time, Say She She, Altın Gün, more music news.

More by this author

PG&E offers more excuses, and will seek to delay and obfuscate over public power

Public power is cheaper, more reliable, and would make money for the city. Just look at the numbers

SF could move to take over PG&E’s system right now, if city officials had the political will

We don't need a new state bill or more hearings. The city could start the public power process immediately—and send a powerful message to the state

It’s time to kick PG&E out of the city. In fact, it’s long, long overdue

Plus: Robocars could cause a massive crisis in an emergency— and the budget for next year is going to be awful. That's The Agenda for Dec. 21-28
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED