Sponsored link
Wednesday, September 28, 2022

Sponsored link

HousingHomelessnessThere's not much care in Newsom's CARE court

There’s not much care in Newsom’s CARE court

But it's coming to San Francisco, soon.

-

Governor Gavin Newsom’s CARE Courts are now law. He signed the legislation on September 14. 

Senate Bill 1338, a Newsom proposal, will create a specialized court where judges can compel people who they decide have mental-health disabilities and substance-use conditions into treatment. The bill allows a broad list of “specified individuals” to refer somebody for conservatorship, and sets a similarly broad set of conditions qualifying them for CARE Court.

The guv is pushing this law despite serious concerns from civil liberties groups.

The list of “specified individuals” includes police officers, and the criteria for placing a person under “care” include being on the spectrum for schizophrenia and not having decision-making capacity for medical care.

By August 18, when the Anti-Police Terror Project staged a teach-in on SB 1338 outside San Francisco City Hall and the Superior Court, the legislation was already well on its way to passage with an overwhelming majority. James Burch, the project’s deputy director, told a crowd of some 40 people, “We’re trying to make sure everybody knows how messed up it is and mobilize some popular energy so that we can resist implementation locally.”

For all the lip service paid to “care” in the bill, none of the $65 million set aside for the program will fund behavioral health services.

“Evidence shows that providing housing and adequately-resourced, voluntary outpatient treatment—not court-ordered treatment—is most effective for treating the population CARE Court seeks to serve,” says Yessica Hernandez, an organizer for the Coalition on Homelessness. “Californians don’t need another racist court system and mental health consumers don’t need another politician stoking fear and pushing fake solutions for political gain.”

At the teach-in, Burch said that “The way the system works is by using a carrot-or-stick model. By that, I mean once you are referred to CARE Court, the judge and team will try to convince you that whatever plan they’re offering should be accepted.” Such a plan would empower the court to deprive one’s right to self-determination. A person in CARE Court can be placed in involuntary holds if they refuse medication for any reason, or does not comply with any of the court’s requirements.

The CARE Courts would also perpetuate existing racial disparities, according to APTP. The legal, mental health, and homeless systems share a disproportionate number of Black people caught up in them. Lopsided arrest and incarceration rates among Black people are already well documented. In California, Black people only make up 6.5 percent of the general population, but account for nearly 40 percent of the homeless population. A 2014 study in the World Journal of Psychiatry reported that Black people in the US are diagnosed with schizophrenia at three times the rate of white people. 

APTP Executive Director Cat Brooks also noted the overlap between race, mental health disabilities, and victimization from state violence.  

“With an estimated quarter of police shootings involving people with mental health disabilities, the idea of having police force Black and brown folks into treatment is a recipe for more police terror on people of color,” she said.

San Francisco is among the first of seven counties that will pilot the CARE Courts by October 1, 2023; California’s remaining counties will implement them by December 1, 2024.

This story originally ran  in the Street Sheet.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Top reads

How independent are Breed’s commissioners? Apparently not very.

Plus: A radical change in the cab industry ... and the Planning Department is talking about 'equity,' but what does that mean? That's The Agenda for Sept. 25-Oct. 2

Lawsuit challenges SF’s homeless policies and seeks to stop sweeps

Data shows how the city repeatedly violates its own policies and federal Constitutional rights.

Bootleg bliss: ‘After All is Said and Done’ is a holy book for Deadheads

Master collector of Grateful Dead fan recordings Mark A. Rodriguez has created a random, righteous anthology.

More by this author

SF to close four more SIP hotels, putting hundreds of unhoused at risk

The feds are still paying, so why the rush to put people on the streets or in dangerous congregate shelters?

City plans to close homeless hotels—so where will people go?

Information scarce on how, when—and whether—suitable relocations will take place.

The year in homeless policy

A few successes and a lot of failures as people on the streets stayed at risk during the pandemic.
Sponsored link
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED