Sponsored link
Thursday, November 12, 2026

Sponsored link

News + PoliticsSupes approve killer robots, 8-3

Supes approve killer robots, 8-3

With the national press watching, even progressives vote for a disturbing escalation in police power.

-

Well, I got that one wrong.

I really didn’t think this Board of Supes was ever going to approve a policy that lets robots use lethal force. In fact, after talking to Sup. Aaron Peskin, who has taken the lead in negotiating the rules on military hardware with the SFPD, I was pretty convinced this thing was going nowhere.

It’s not quite time for Robocop. Yet. Wikimedia Commons image

And yet, by an 8-3 vote, the board today approved a policy that allows the use of killer robots in what an amendment by Peskin describes as a dire emergency:

[W]hen risk of loss of life to members of the public or officers is imminent and officers cannot subdue the threat after using alternative force options or de-escalation tactics options, or conclude that they will not be able to subdue the threat after evaluating alternative force options or de-escalation tactics. 

The cops talked about situations like the Las Vegas shooting, where in fact a robot would have been useless since the shooter was on the 34th floor of a hotel.

Only Sups. Hillary Ronen, Dean Preston, and Shamann Walton voted against the plan. So much for a progressive majority. Even Sup. Gordon Mar, who already lost his re-election and has nothing more to lose, voted with the police.

To be clear here, SFPD won’t actually be sending Robocop into battle (and by the way, that movie is a parable about the dangers of privatizing the police force). The robots will be operated by a human, just as the drones that are used to kill people in wars are operated by humans who just happen in many cases to be thousands of miles away.

But it’s a huge precedent that has received national attention. San Francisco, the progressive city, has approved a policy that gives the cops another potentially very dangerous tool to use in what are, frankly, vague situations.

Yes, the rules say that only very senior officers can authorize the killer robots—but given the way senior cops have authorized and defended a lot of completely unacceptable killings in this town, that doesn’t blunt the impact of the decision.

It does suggest that the media-hyped Fear of Crime that led to some of the worst criminal-justice policies in modern history in the 1980s is back, in this city, right now.

And then I see this in New York, and I think: It’s going to be an ugly time in local politics.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. 

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.
Sponsored link
Sponsored link

Featured

Screen Grabs: Mermaids, magic, John Cameron Mitchell… It’s Trans Film Fest time

Plus: A history of Black zombies, Jewish Film Fest Encore, jokey 'Nirvanna,' two very good movies about grief, more

Celebrating photographer Minnette Lehmann’s 97 years of radicalism, feminism, ruthless critique

Memorial honoring Bay Area art world stalwart to be held Sun/15 at The Lab.

William Kentridge’s latest monumental stage work takes on Africa in World War I

'We found a physical spasm in the body that reflects a spasm of history,' says artist of 'The Head & the Load'

More by this author

Homelessness? Evictions? Not the mayor’s priority

But thanking a billionaire who got rich from illegal conversion of apartments to hotel rooms? Sure.

The legacy of the late, great Harry Britt, who would not have backed Scott Wiener …

Plus: Homeless count soars, protecting hotel workers, and what will the mayor do about Crocker Amazon Park? That's The Agenda for Nov. 8-15

Planning Commission rejects plan to save low income people from displacement

Chen bill would make sure housing demolitions don't eliminate affordable housing. Mayoral appointees say no.
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED