Sponsored link
Tuesday, April 22, 2025

Sponsored link

News + PoliticsCity HallBreed says she wants even more power

Breed says she wants even more power

On national podcast, she says she missed the pandemic days when she had emergency authority, and calls for limits on what supes can do.

-

Jon Lovett, a former Obama speechwriter who hosts “Lovett or Leave It,” one of the most popular political podcasts in the country, parachuted into San Francisco last week to do a live show that featured Mayor London Breed demanding even more power for one of the strongest mayors in California.

Lovett demonstrated at total lack of understanding of the state’s housing crisis, and gave Breed a platform to send a mangled political message to the liberals who listen to the podcast.

Some of the material is comedy, and it’s funny, and Lovett is a great communicator. But the central focus of the discussion was housing, and while what Breed said isn’t surprising, really, it fit into a dangerous narrative for DC insiders.

London Breed is among the most powerful mayors in the country, but that’s not enough.

In essence, the podcast suggested that the reason San Francisco (and by implication the state and the nation) has an affordable housing crisis is that progressives have blocked projects that might have made it less expensive to live in the city.

Lovett mentioned a Yimby favorite, the 469 Stevenson Street project, which has now been approved and likely never be built—not because of Nimbys or progressives but because it has no financing.

He also mentioned, apparently, the Monster in the Mission, saying that progressive opposed a project because it might lead to displacement—”although a lack of housing creates displacement.”

Mr. Lovett: Thanks to the opposition you denounce, that project is now going to be 100 percent affordable housing.

Breed and Lovett continued to make the obviously inaccurate statement that “San Francisco need to build 82,000 housing units” under state law.

Sponsored link

Help us save local journalism!

Every tax-deductible donation helps us grow to cover the issues that mean the most to our community. Become a 48 Hills Hero and support the only daily progressive news source in the Bay Area.

San Francisco, as I have said many times, builds no housing units. Developers build housing. And they only build when they can make enough profit to satisfy the speculative capital that finances housing these days.

But Breed complained the “CEQA” and “bureaucracy” were slowing housing development, and contributing to the lack of affordability.

In fact, Breed complained over and over about the city “bureaucracy,” and said that she can’t even hire department heads, which is wrong: The mayor appoints a majority of every commission that oversees a department, and I don’t believe there has ever been a case where a mayor wanted a new department head and was unable to hire that person.

In fact, it’s usually the opposite—check out the new director of the War Memorial, who has no qualifications for the job be was hired because Breed wanted that to happen.

Breed oversees the “bureaucracy.” San Francisco has a very strong mayor system; the chief executive controls the budget and all spending, controls all city departments, and can appoint people to fill any vacancy, which she has done with the offices of city attorney and district attorney.

Lovett, who clearly knows nothing about San Francisco government, didn’t challenge her on that point, and allowed her to say that during the pandemic, when she declared a state of emergency, she was able to get things done. (She was not responsible for the program that saved hundreds of lives by getting homeless people into hotel rooms; she opposed it.)

She told the podcaster that she wants a system where “the mayor has to be able to be an executive and make decisions.”

In other words: She wants the Board of Supes to have even less power, and the voters to have even less power, and to eliminate what remains of the limited checks and balances the supes have over the way the city is run.

Meanwhile, the Chron finally noticed that the media narrative it helped create, about San Francisco falling apart with crime and economic disaster, is causing problems. The paper admits that it ran one story talking about the “doom loop,” but has not acknowledged, nor has Breed, that the entire narrative started with politically charged efforts to discredit former District Attorney Chesa Boudin.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.
Sponsored link
Sponsored link

Featured

The Dyke March needs help to return full-throttle

New organizers launch fundraiser to restore Pride Weekend's radical centerpiece to its sprawling, outspoken self.

Heads up, star eyes: Chabot Center’s observation deck reopens for astronomy fans

The 142-year-old community science stalwart's renovated gazing platform offers the chance to engage on a cosmic level.

How ‘Sesame Street’ and ‘Black Angels’ sparked a new Kronos Quartet

As Kronos Fest's annual explosion of musical ideas approaches, new members Gabby Díaz and Ayane Kozasa speak about joining in.

More by this author

‘A Greek Tragedy’ reveals the painful story of the human crisis of migration

One day, one shipwreck, one small island, hundreds dead—and multiple big lessons for society

The basic idea of telling people about development runs into the Yimby agenda

Plus: The end of harm reduction as a primary policy. That's The Agenda for April 20-27

Fielder proposal to protect unhoused families runs into opposition from ‘moderates’

Sauter, Sherrill try to kill a measure that would give a bit of hope to some of the city's most vulnerable residents
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED