Sponsored link
Tuesday, December 30, 2025

Sponsored link

News + PoliticsTask Force finally listens to community, moves 5-4 to reject gerrymandered map

Task Force finally listens to community, moves 5-4 to reject gerrymandered map

Community organizing forces panel to adopt a more acceptable map—for now.

-

Rev. Arnold Townsend, the chair of the Redistricting Task Force who acknowledged he was under immense pressure from the Mayor’s Office to promote a highly gerrymandered sups map, changed his position early this morning and voted for a new version that community activists say is going in a much better direction.

The 5-4 vote, with Townsend in the majority, reflected another type of politics: Organizers and activists representing the Black, Asian, Latinx, LGBTQ+ and other communities turned out in huge numbers over the past two weeks, spending long hours at rallies and in public hearings and making many hundreds of comments against the gerrymandered map.

A new working map, called the “healing map,” shows the power of community organizing

Some had said that if the gerrymandered map was approved, it would lead to lawsuits and possibly a fall ballot measure overturning the decision.

The new draft map, called a “healing map,” restores Potrero Hill to District 10, puts the Tenderloin and central Soma back together, and leaves much more of the original District 5 intact. It still moves the ultra-rich Seacliff from District 2 into District 1.

Raquel Redondiez, on behalf of the SF Unity Map Coalition issued the following statement:

We thank the Task Force for listening to the overwhelming community input that the final map would have been detrimental to the city’s most vulnerable populations. We hope the Task Force will listen to the community in its additional meetings and draw a fair map that truly reflects public input, prioritizes those who depend most on city services, and protects the political voice of working-class neighborhoods, communities of color, LGBTQ+ and other vulnerable communities.

For the hundreds who have been fighting this battle, it’s a sigh of relief—and sends a strong message that grassroots organizing works, even up against some very powerful interests.

But this still isn’t over.

The Task Force agreed to miss the April 15 deadline, which really meant nothing, and hold another meeting April 21. The Department of Elections needs the map to be complete by May 5.

If the Task Force decides to accept something close to the new map, it will revert to what community groups asked for ten days ago—and the panel seemed willing to accept.

Then the pressure started, and the direction of the mapping changed, dramatically.

It seems unlikely that the powerful interests trying to gerrymander progressives out of office will give up after this setback.

So everything—in public anyway—will settle down for a week. Then the Task Force will meet again, at least once, facing a real deadline, and hammer out a final map.

But it won’t be quiet behind the scenes. We will keep you posted.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.
Sponsored link
Sponsored link

Featured

For more than half a century, the progressives in SF have been right—and the developers wrong

We have murals and books and movies celebrating the opponents of demolitions like the I-Hotel and redevelopment. What will we look back on 20 years from now?

Comedowns are for losers: New Year’s Day parties 2026

Don't flag out once the ball drops: From Breakfast of Champions to Supper of Survivors, we've got your marathon revels covered.

Drama Masks: Year on Stage 2025, part 1—the not-so-great stuff

A year of devastating cuts, wild uncertainty, and unexpected departures left its mark on the SF scene.

More by this author

For more than half a century, the progressives in SF have been right—and the developers wrong

We have murals and books and movies celebrating the opponents of demolitions like the I-Hotel and redevelopment. What will we look back on 20 years from now?

SF could move to take over PG&E’s system right now, if city officials had the political will

We don't need a new state bill or more hearings. The city could start the public power process immediately—and send a powerful message to the state

It’s time to kick PG&E out of the city. In fact, it’s long, long overdue

Plus: Robocars could cause a massive crisis in an emergency— and the budget for next year is going to be awful. That's The Agenda for Dec. 21-28
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED