Sponsored link
Friday, March 13, 2026

Sponsored link

LGBTQCastro Theater landmarking delayed for two weeks as supes say APE needs...

Castro Theater landmarking delayed for two weeks as supes say APE needs to step up

Promoter needs to cut deal with community quickly, or face a decision that will undermine its plans, 'frustrated' board members say.

-

The next decision on the future of the Castro theater will be delayed two weeks after a Board of Supes committee accepted Sup. Rafael Mandelman’s proposal for a continuance.

But the committee members, and Mandelman, made it clear that they are sympathetic to the preservationists and are inclined to vote in favor of landmarking the interior, including the fixed seating and raked floor, unless Another Planet Entertainment comes up with a solution more palatable to the community.

The future of the theater will wait two weeks, but the supes seem impatient.

The activists had asked the committee to amend into the landmark designation specific language that would block APE from removing the seats, leveling the floor, adding movable seats, and creating a venue more amenable to the promoter’s vision for live music.

Sup. Aaron Peskin urged APE to get together with the community to find a solution, saying that his past meetings “have been very frustrating.”

He addressed CEO Gregg Perloff: “You have to walk the walk and talk the talk a little faster. … APE walked into this thing like the 300-pound gorilla, hired everyone they could hire … APE needs to start talking real turkey real fast.”

Records on file with the Ethics Commission show that the company has spent $61,000 on lobbyists in the past 12 months, hiring Andrew Junius, David Noyola, Jaqueline Piccini, and Alex Tourke to push their interests at City Hall.

(In exchange, the records show, the lobbyists have met with city officials about 15 times. That’s roughly $4,000 a meeting. Nice work if you can get it.)

Sup. Dean Preston said that “I am one third of this committee, and I am fully supportive of the community amendments.”

Sponsored link

Mandelman, who represents the Castro, said “I am hopeful we can get to a win-win-win.” But he noted if the parties can’t get there, then the amendments might be the best way to go.

Peskin also noted that by law, one-third of the events at the Castro will have to be film, or the venue needs a change-of-use permit. And he said that the concert and some film model APE is presenting “is not a business model that can work five or six times a week, maybe only one or two times, which means the place will be vacant half the year.”

So now APE is going to have to figure out a way to work with the folks who want to save the existing seats and flooring, or face a landmarking decision that will end the promoter’s current plans.

David Perry, a spokesperson for APE, told me:

We share every one’s passion for the Castro Theatre, and deeply appreciate everyone who spoke today about that passion, regardless of their position.  Another Planet shares that passion, and is why we are endeavoring so hard to truly save the Castro Theatre and everything it represents, especially for the LGBTQ and film communities. We were encouraged today to hear the growing support for, and true understanding of those plans, which we encourage everyone to view on the Castro website.  Our continued thoughtful and cordial discussions with the leadership of the Castro Conservancy have led to a better plan. Today’s continuance gives us additional time to work with them, and with everyone, who truly understands what it will take to save the Castro for future generations.

The next hearing is April 17.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.
Sponsored link

Featured

Lurie plan uses regressive taxes to ‘save’ Muni, in the short term

Mayor's plan caps the levy on the biggest and richest landlords and only addresses a portion of the longterm budget crisis

Party Radar: Foghorns, ToonTown, tagging— celebrating SF house wizard DJ Buck

Local legend brought 'The Bells of San Francisco" to global dance floors, and helped introduce the City to rave.

BIG WEEK: Full Queer Wrestling, Pi Day, Alysa Liu celebration, ‘Women Who Ride’…

Plus: Peaches Christ eats the rich, Duserock, Maria BC, Greek and Irish films, Renegade Orchestra, more to do!

More by this author

Lurie had a great year—if you’re in the top 20 percent

For San Franciscans who are not rich, the city's numbers aren't looking anywhere near as good.

How to tax AI when companies replace human workers

Plus: Will the supes be serious about protecting rent-controlled housing from greedy speculators? That's The Agenda for March 8-15

Airbnb, under pressure from labor, drops $120 million lawsuit against SF

After calls for boycott, giant company folds in a win for activists who fight corporate tax cuts
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED