Sponsored link
Friday, April 26, 2024

Sponsored link

News + PoliticsPG&E Scam warning

PG&E Scam warning

That ballot measure gathering signatures for “clean power” is actually an attack on CleanPowerSF, sponsored by PG&E allies

48hillspgande

By Tim Redmond

JUNE 29, 2105 – There were people on the streets gathering signatures for two ballot measure this weekend – and some confusion. Apparently the same company that was hired to put the Mission Moratorium on the ballot is also working for PG&E’s union in its efforts to screw up CleanPowerSF.

So the person I ran into in the Mission asked me to sign both for “affordable housing” and “clean energy.”

One is true. The other is a scam.

The Mission Moratorium is sponsored by community leaders concerned about the lack of affordable housing and the massive displacement that’s happening in the community.

The “clean energy” measure is sponsored by the IBEW Local 1245 and signed by IBEW leader Hunter Stern.  It sounds fine – it says that the city would be required to disclose how much of its CleanPowerSF energy is from truly renewable sources.

But according the city attorney, the measure also:

would also prohibit the City from engaging in any form of advertising or marketing, or from making any public statement, that the electricity it is supplying or will supply in a CCA program is “clean,” “green,” or any similar term, unless the electricity is “renewable, greenhouse gas-free electricity” under the measure.

It’s impossible to start a clean energy public-power program with 100 percent greenhouse-gas free electricity. That’s why PG&E’s allies (and IBEW 1245 has always, always sided with the utility against public power) are doing this. It’s a clear attack on public power.

Remember: PG&E claims to be starting up a clean-power option, but at least 20 percent of the utility’s power comes from a nuclear plant at Diablo Canyon. Is that “greenhouse gas-free?” Some people might argue that. Is it “green?” Not by any standard.

It’s too bad that the measures are together – and that PG&E’s allies are using the term “clean power” to prevent the city from moving forward with clean power.

Just be warned: One ballot measure is a real grassroots effort. The other is a PG&E scam.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.

Sponsored link

Featured

Supes rent-relief program saved 20,000 people from eviction during the pandemic

New city report shows how taxing the rich to help low-income renters is highly effective.

Nothing’s gonna rain on ‘Funny Girl’ Katerina McCrimmon’s SF parade

“I've always been fighting to make it this far," says the dynamo Fanny Brice with Miami roots and plenty of chutzpah.

Supes put a hold on Breed’s Treasure Island developer bailout plan

Mayor's Office, developers now have to figure out how to move forward with a deeply troubled project

More by this author

Supreme Court hears critical case on homeless policy (SF wants to legalize sweeps) …

... Plus: Is the SF Zoo really capable of hosting pandas, and is the city ready to start letting developers off the hook for the impacts their projects create? That's The Agenda for April 24-31

Is protesting in traffic ‘false imprisonment?’

Then what about Waymo blocking a highway entrance ramp?

New conservative DCCC members will face vote on critical labor issues

Will the 'moderate' majority elected with tech money support bills that regulate AI, robotaxis, and robotrucks?
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED