Sponsored link
Friday, April 26, 2024

Sponsored link

UncategorizedBREAKING: Judge refuses to remove waterfront measure from ballot

BREAKING: Judge refuses to remove waterfront measure from ballot

By Tim Redmond

March 18, 2014 — Judge Marla Miller refused today to order a waterfront planning measure removed from the San Francisco ballot.

In a seven-page decision, Miller concluded that the dramatic step of blocking a measure before the voters had a chance to weigh in was not justified.’

The ruling came just one day after a hearing on the issue.

She noted that numerous other ballot measures have sought to regulate land use on the San Francisco waterfront, although she agreed that there are potential issues around the legality of local voters addressing lands deeded to San Francisco by the state.

Still, she concluded, those issues could easily be litigated and adjudicated after the election.

“Petitioners have not clearly established that the challenge is meritorious such that it justifies the ‘dramatic step’ of withholding the measure from the voters,” she ruled.

That doesn’t mean the legal fight over Prop. B is over — but it does mean the measure will appear on the June ballot.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. 

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.

Sponsored link

Featured

Supes rent-relief program saved 20,000 people from eviction during the pandemic

New city report shows how taxing the rich to help low-income renters is highly effective.

Nothing’s gonna rain on ‘Funny Girl’ Katerina McCrimmon’s SF parade

“I've always been fighting to make it this far," says the dynamo Fanny Brice with Miami roots and plenty of chutzpah.

Supes put a hold on Breed’s Treasure Island developer bailout plan

Mayor's Office, developers now have to figure out how to move forward with a deeply troubled project

More by this author

Supreme Court hears critical case on homeless policy (SF wants to legalize sweeps) …

... Plus: Is the SF Zoo really capable of hosting pandas, and is the city ready to start letting developers off the hook for the impacts their projects create? That's The Agenda for April 24-31

Is protesting in traffic ‘false imprisonment?’

Then what about Waymo blocking a highway entrance ramp?

New conservative DCCC members will face vote on critical labor issues

Will the 'moderate' majority elected with tech money support bills that regulate AI, robotaxis, and robotrucks?
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED