Sponsored link
Wednesday, December 31, 2025

Sponsored link

News + PoliticsLaborWalton wants $5 hourly hazard pay for supermarket workers

Walton wants $5 hourly hazard pay for supermarket workers

Essential employees at high risk as big chains rake in huge profits.

-

Sup. Shamann Walton is moving to require large grocery stores in San Francisco to give their workers $5 an hour hazard pay during the worst of the pandemic.

Sup. Shamann Walton is calling for hazard pay for people who allow essential stores to stay open.

Walton announced Tuesday that he has asked the city attorney to draft legislation mandating the pay increases (as part of the city’s minimum-wage law) for the essential workers who, of course, can’t work from home.

The law would only impact the big operators, like Safeway, Whole Foods, and Trader Joe’s, that qualify as “formula retail” under the city’s current rules.

All of those companies initially offered bonuses of between $2 and $5 an hour starting in March, but they all stopped the program in June, Jim Araby, director of strategic campaigns for United Food and Commercial Workers Local 5, told me.

And the crisis is way worse now. “We’ve had 700 members get COVID at work, and five have died,” he told me.

The stores can clearly afford it: All of the major chains have reported record profits this year, which is no surprise: People are eating less at restaurants – and in some cases, panic shopping at supermarkets.

“The workers are taking huge risks here, and the stores aren’t sharing the profits,” Araby said.

Similar ordinances are under consideration in Los Angeles, Long Beach, and San Jose.

Natalie Gee, an aide to Walton, said the final version will probably be introduced in January.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.
Sponsored link
Sponsored link

Featured

In 2026, let’s not follow failed housing policies in progressive San Francisco

Housing First works. So why is SF siding with Trump to try do undo it?

Good Taste: 8 delicious reasons to welcome 2026

Ferry Building additions, Presidio newcomers, and a “no holds barred” supper club: next year is looking tasty already.

Year in Music 2025: The Bay made magical noise

SPELLLING's R&B wild-out, Orcutt Shelley Miller's moonlit jams, Spiritual Cramp's guerrilla punk... a watershed year for local ears

More by this author

For more than half a century, the progressives in SF have been right—and the developers wrong

We have murals and books and movies celebrating the opponents of demolitions like the I-Hotel and redevelopment. What will we look back on 20 years from now?

PG&E offers more excuses, and will seek to delay and obfuscate over public power

Public power is cheaper, more reliable, and would make money for the city. Just look at the numbers

SF could move to take over PG&E’s system right now, if city officials had the political will

We don't need a new state bill or more hearings. The city could start the public power process immediately—and send a powerful message to the state
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED