Sponsored link
Friday, January 23, 2026

Sponsored link

News + PoliticsHousingPlanning Commission wants more clarity on building where Chinese immigrants evicted

Planning Commission wants more clarity on building where Chinese immigrants evicted

Panel refuses to approve minutes that lack direct accountability for department and property owners

-

The Planning Commission Thursday voted—in a very unusual move—to delay the approval of the minutes from its Aug. 25 meeting.

The minutes are usually a formality (most of the time, I suspect that the members of most boards and commissions never read the minutes of the previous meeting before approving them).

The building at 45 Bernard could set a precedent for stronger planning oversight of evictions

But in this case, the minutes reflected (or didn’t exactly reflect) what the commission had decided in the case of 45 Bernard, a building where 11 Chinese immigrants had been evicted so the new owners could turn it into their own modern condos.

The commissioners made clear that they weren’t quite satisfied with what the department had drafted, for the record, in terms of what they were actually demanding.

The minutes were pretty brief:

1. No roof deck; 2. No spiral stair; and 3. Update report within six months of BPA issuance. Recognizing: A reference to the Rent Control Ordinance as it relates to tenant rights, OMI evictions, and first right of refusal. Encouraging a green rear yard open space.

But Sue Hestor, a longtime land-use lawyer, called in to say that the commission ought to wait a week and ask for more clarity in the minutes.

The commission didn’t just “reference” the Rent Control Ordinance. The members were very clear that they wanted the department to monitor the building, to make sure that if the owners decided to move out the original tenants were tracked down, contacted, and given the right to return at their old rent-controlled rent.

Commission Chair Kathrin Moore agreed: “This is important to us,” she said, “particularly since the developer is from out of town. It would be helpful for all of us to have it more clearly spelled out.”

So the department will have to come back with a more robust set of requirements, and the commission (for once dominated by appointees of the supes, since the mayor is behind in filling vacancies) sent a strong message that it’s not going to ignore the impacts of evictions on the community and is going to hold property owners to higher standards.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.
Sponsored link
Sponsored link

Featured

Under the Stars: Farsight hits and dips into new ‘Situations’

Plus: Rob Reiner Tribute takes over the Parkway, Parameter festival is coming, DJ Delon drops a hot mix, more

Screen Grabs: Ann Lee won’t take any of your crap

Women take center screen, including 'Mother of Flies,' 'H is for Hawk,' 'In Cold Light,' and 'Sound of Falling.'

Drama Masks: Does ‘The Book of Mormon’ hold up in darker times?

'South Park' creators' Broadway smash returns at 15. Plus: Killing My Lobster popped back in with a sexy mime competition.

More by this author

New study shows that deregulation is not the answer to the affordable housing crisis

Upzoning might make SF affordable—in 100 years. Or we could address economic inequality, the real cause of the problem

Lurie discovers affordability

But of course, that doesn't mean taxing the billionaires

So what if the billionaires leave California?

A member of Patriotic Millionaires says the rich probably won't flee a new wealth tax—but we might be better off if some of them did
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED