Sponsored link
Thursday, November 30, 2023

Sponsored link

News + PoliticsEnvironmentHealth Commission meeting turns into discussion of toxics at Hunters Point

Health Commission meeting turns into discussion of toxics at Hunters Point

A modest administrative change sets off a fury as speakers demand better testing at the shipyard development site.

-

A relatively modest administrative change to a city law involving controls on toxic waste in construction came before the Health Commission tonight—and turned into a discussion of the ongoing, serious, health issues for residents of Bayview Hunters Point.

The matter at issue was Article 31 of the Health Code, which mandates some health and safety rules for companies that move soil during the cleanup and redevelopment of the Hunters Point Shipyard.

It’s fairly complex, and the department wants to make the language and the rules more simple and transparent. That’s the idea, anyway.

Dr. Ahimsa Sumchai shows a map of cancer clusters in Hunters Point. Photo by Tom Molanphy

But people who showed up and called in to speak weren’t as interested in the administrative changes as in the sickness and neglect that has marked the entire process of turning the highly contaminated shipyard into what the city insists can be safe space for housing.

Article 31 requires testing of soils and dust, and sets rules for mitigation measures when contractors stir up what may be dangerous stuff as they work to develop the site.

Speakers said that’s nowhere near enough: The rules ought to mandate testing of human beings.

Tonia Randell, who works with the Maria Harrison Community Foundation, noted that “there is nothing about testing residents to see if the dust is affecting their health.”

Randell noted that “I have a high level or arsenic and manganese in my body.” She’s not the only one; studies show significant toxic chemicals in the bodies of people who live near the shipyard.

Arieann Harrison, who also works with the Marie Harrison Community Foundation, said that “we have people coming up with uranium exposure. You need to test human beings and put in some form of repair for what’s already been done.”

Dr. Ahimsa Sumchai, who has done extensive monitoring work at the shipyard, talked about cancer clusters, including radiogenic breast cancer, which is normally rare, in young people. “The cancer clusters include a ten-year-old,” she said. “People are exposed to ionizing radiation.”

Dr. Teresa Palmer, a geriatric medicine specialist, urged the commission not to vote on the measure until the department can provide more information about “building on poisoned land.”

But the panel voted to approve the changes and asked the department to report back in three months.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.

Top reads

No words: Savor the Castro’s last moments as movie palace with ‘A Day of Silents’

Start off with 10am all-cartoon bill, and stay for slapstick, swashbuckle, and romantical burlesque on the beloved screen.

Good Taste: Mochi crust to paneer pies, 2 pizza shops that aren’t serving your average slice

Mochiko Mochi Pizza and Mr. Singh's offer up some roundly innovative 'za.

Screen Grabs: Sex, tech, and Godzilla—who could ask for anything more?

Three film fests bring the essentials. Plus: 'Pee Wee's Big Adventure' and more '80s delights

More by this author

No, the supes didn’t ‘punt’ on housing bill

A measure that makes no sense is still on track; here's what it might mean for the city.

On Giving Tuesday, please support the future of local news in San Francisco

Local newspapers are dying all over, threatening democracy. We are trying to keep community journalism alive. Can you help?

Housing bill that makes no sense at all moves forward with reluctant committee vote

Trickle-down economics from the Reagan Era rules as the state forces San Francisco to give luxury developers what they want (and ignores affordable housing).
Sponsored link
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED