Sponsored link
Friday, July 30, 2021

Sponsored link

UncategorizedEthics Commission cracks down on independent expenditure committee

Ethics Commission cracks down on independent expenditure committee

Group that backed Farrell for supervisor coordinated too closely with the candidate’s committee; now he’s on the hook for $190,000

The Ethics Commission, which let Mayor Ed Lee of the hook, cracks down on Mark Farrell
The Ethics Commission, which let Mayor Ed Lee of the hook, cracks down on Mark Farrell

By Larry Bush

June 5, 2015 — In a 5-0 vote, the SF Ethics Commission today rejected for the second time a proposal by  Executive Director John St. Croix to waive a $191,000 fine against Sup. Mark Farrell’s campaign committee as a result of an “independent” campaign run against his 2010 opponent.

The vote sends a strong message that these supposedly distinct committees, which often raise and spend huge sums of money, can’t skirt the rules and work as a secret part of a candidate’s official campaign.

Janet Reilly, who lost to Farrell, had filed a complaint that Farrell’s campaign benefitted from the Common Sense Voters committee that operated to attack her. Some $150,000 in contributions to that independent expenditure committee came from Thomas Coates, and another $40,000 from Denise Hale, both friends of Farrell.

Farrell won by only 258 votes, suggesting that the IE could have changed the outcome of the election.

So-called IE committees have to operate entirely separate from official campaign committees. Under city law, a candidate can only raise $500 from any one donor; IEs, thanks to the US Supreme Court, can raise unlimited money from anyone.

But the catch is that the IEs can’t coordinate anything with the official campaign: no contacts, no discussions of strategy – nothing. And an investigation by the Fair Political Practices Commission found that the CSV group was actually working closely with the Farrell campaign.

That meant that Farrell would have to pay back to the city the difference between what the IE raised and what it would have been allowed if every donor gave only $500.

This kind of wink-and-a-nod coordination has happened in the past, largely with impunity. Ethics did nothing when it was very clear that now-disgraced campaign consultant Enrique Pearce was running an IE that had to be coordinating the campaign of Mayor Ed Lee.

But Reilly, unlike the foes of Mayor Lee, had the resources and motivation to hire a law firm to file and pursue this complaint. And Farrell, whom the state’s Fair Political Practices Commission had exonerated, took the hit.

The FPPC found that the fault was primarily with the campaign consultants he had hired.

Farrell’s spokesperson told the Chron that he would take the issue to court and doesn’t expect to wind up paying anything.

St. Croix tried to argue that Farrell should be off the hook because the supervisor himself had not been identified by the FPPC as being at fault, and the statute of limitations had passed for the commission to act.

I informed the commission that St. Croix’s statement that the agency was not informed until December was inaccurate, because I had an email from the FPPC to Ethics dated in August informing the agency that the investigation was complete, providing a copy of the finished stipulation, and offering to do a joint release with a copy of a model joint statement — and that Ethics had no record of any reply going back to the FPPC.

As to Farrell’s fault, that question was punted in favor of forwarding the entire matter on where another body would examine that question.

Farrell was represented by Jim Sutton, and once again did not attend the commission meeting or speak in his defense.

Commission chair Paul Renne termed the violation “egregious” and among the most serious to come before the commission.

Several commissioners said that this case had been mishandled by staff and that new oversight is required — and even Sutton in defending Farrell recommended that the commission examine St. Croix’ relationship to the commission and adopt new rules.

Rob van Ravenswaay, a member of the recent Civil Grand Jury, spoke to say that the Grand Jury had recommended a policy that the commission, and not staff, make these decisions.

Several Friends of Ethics representatives spoke, including van Ravenswaay, Bob Planthold, Charlie Marsteller and me. Attending and closely following to let the commission know of its interest were Elena Schmid, past foreperson of the Civil Grand Jury, Hulda Garfolo, pas chair of the 2011 Civil Grand Jury report on Ethics, Bob Dockendorff, past Ethics Commission member, and others.

With St. Croix on his way out, the Ethics Commission may be taking seriously the challenge of limiting the sewer money that is corrupting local politics.


Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.
Sponsored link


  1. What other campaigns for supervisor have been found culpable of violations and fined by the FPPC for collaboration with independent expenditure committees?

    Hallucinations make for poor posts.

  2. I agree, but that still doesn’t explain why only Farrell is being singled out here when we all know that all supervisors do stuff like this.

  3. And yet Campos gets a pass even though he does the same thing, just because his lobbyists are preferable to you?

  4. It is refreshing to watch someone who is not a corporate shill practicing political science successfully against the corporate shills.

  5. This is nothing but sour grapes on the part of Janet Reilly, who was trying to buy that seat with the help and connections of her husband, SF political boss Clint Reilly! Enough already!

  6. And if Campos had done the exact same thing (and I will bet that all candidates do this to some extent) you would never have read about it on 48 Hills

  7. Blah blah, progressives bad, blah blah.

    I hope Conway is paying you well because only having 1 skill isn’t really marketable.

  8. I got as far as “Common Sense Voters committee,” if I have learned anything from progressives politics in this city it is that no one would ever buzz word name anything incorrectly.

    If common sense is in the name it must be common sense that they are striving for.

  9. great news! thank you, Larry Bush for working to clean up our corrupt City Hall as best you can!!

Comments are closed.

Sponsored link

Top reads

SF to pay $8 million after cops framed an innocent man for murder

Plus: An urban farm in the Portola, and shadows on two city parks ... That's The Agenda for July 26-August 1.

Review: Wangechi Mutu brings cosmic energies to Legion of Honor

Stunningly reverberating with the collection, 'I Am Speaking, Are You Listening?' tells different stories of art

The campaign against CRT is all about preserving white privilege

That's the story the right-wing politicians don't want to talk about—because it's still a very real part of American life.

More by this author

Muni director talks about cutting lines and changing focus

Post-COVID plans could alter the city's transportation policy in some profound ways.

SF to pay $8 million after cops framed an innocent man for murder

Plus: An urban farm in the Portola, and shadows on two city parks ... That's The Agenda for July 26-August 1.

How did the Housing Authority ignore awful conditions at Plaza East?

Western Addition public housing project has been a disaster -- but a private contractor ran it with very little oversight.
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED