Sponsored link
Wednesday, June 7, 2023

Sponsored link

Home News + Politics Houses over Bernal gas pipeline delayed again

Houses over Bernal gas pipeline delayed again

Ronen points out that we can't trust PG&E to ensure that a 36-year-old high-pressure gas pipe won't blow up

The "experts" at PG&E caused this disaster; why should we rely on them to do better in SF?

The City Planning Department will have to do additional research on the chance that a pipeline under Bernal Hill could explode during the construction of two houses, the Board of Supes decided today.

The issue has been back and forth between the board and city planners for  years, mostly because the Planning can’t seem to figure out its own rules around environmental review.

The “experts” at PG&E caused this disaster; why should we rely on them to do better in SF?

In essence, the question goes like this: Should the city trust PG&E  and a developer to make sure that two houses build on a steep slope with a 36-year-old high-pressure gas main under the ground doesn’t lead to a total disaster?

Sup. Hillary Ronen, who represents the district, was pretty clear: Given “PG&E’s abysmal history and reputation on pipeline safety,” there’s reason for concern.

The pipeline is one of the few in the city that isn’t buried under a street. The city doesn’t even know at this point how deep the earth above the pipeline is — 24 inches? Or 36 inches? Not clear.

The pipeline has never been fully examined for the sort of potential flaws that destroyed an entire neighborhood in San Bruno.

Justin Horner, a city planning staffer, said that “inadvertent affects that could be caused by negligence are not part of the [environmental review] process.

Which is why the city has argued that a full environmental study isn’t needed. 

So it’s back for another round. The lawyer for the builder, who says he plans to live in one of the houses, complained that this process has been going on for four years, which is true. But I wonder: if the planners had insisted on adequate environmental study from the beginning, would we even be here now?


  1. YIMBys are not right-wingers. We know that the housing shortage in California is acute in all counties, and the only solution is to build-build-build. The NIMBys are the reactionaries here. They want to status quo to remain stuck forever, new construction be damned.

  2. I honestly feel like gas pipelines should be banned and a concerted effort to switch to city to all-electric should begin. It's not worth the risk in a seismically active city.

  3. Thankfully someone is paying attention. The last thing we need is to blow up another neighborhood in our haste to "build more housing." Residents have been voicing concerns about this pipe for years. Neighbors will be relived to know someone has come to their senses. There is a general problem with an environmental review program that does not take into account the actual natural environment that is existing in determining how the project under review will effect that natural existing situation. A hearing is needed to clarify where and how such matters as seismic conditions and flood plains are taken into account in the building permit process, which is where, we understand this sort of issue is supposedly taken up. Please announce this hearing to the broadest audience possible and please cover this in the media regardless of how many other events occur on that day.

  4. This is the kind of caution that YIMBYs and their buddy Scott Wiener, and their right-wing backers want to do away with.

Comments are closed.