Sponsored link
Friday, January 2, 2026

Sponsored link

News + PoliticsTask Force finally listens to community, moves 5-4 to reject gerrymandered map

Task Force finally listens to community, moves 5-4 to reject gerrymandered map

Community organizing forces panel to adopt a more acceptable map—for now.

-

Rev. Arnold Townsend, the chair of the Redistricting Task Force who acknowledged he was under immense pressure from the Mayor’s Office to promote a highly gerrymandered sups map, changed his position early this morning and voted for a new version that community activists say is going in a much better direction.

The 5-4 vote, with Townsend in the majority, reflected another type of politics: Organizers and activists representing the Black, Asian, Latinx, LGBTQ+ and other communities turned out in huge numbers over the past two weeks, spending long hours at rallies and in public hearings and making many hundreds of comments against the gerrymandered map.

A new working map, called the “healing map,” shows the power of community organizing

Some had said that if the gerrymandered map was approved, it would lead to lawsuits and possibly a fall ballot measure overturning the decision.

The new draft map, called a “healing map,” restores Potrero Hill to District 10, puts the Tenderloin and central Soma back together, and leaves much more of the original District 5 intact. It still moves the ultra-rich Seacliff from District 2 into District 1.

Raquel Redondiez, on behalf of the SF Unity Map Coalition issued the following statement:

We thank the Task Force for listening to the overwhelming community input that the final map would have been detrimental to the city’s most vulnerable populations. We hope the Task Force will listen to the community in its additional meetings and draw a fair map that truly reflects public input, prioritizes those who depend most on city services, and protects the political voice of working-class neighborhoods, communities of color, LGBTQ+ and other vulnerable communities.

For the hundreds who have been fighting this battle, it’s a sigh of relief—and sends a strong message that grassroots organizing works, even up against some very powerful interests.

But this still isn’t over.

The Task Force agreed to miss the April 15 deadline, which really meant nothing, and hold another meeting April 21. The Department of Elections needs the map to be complete by May 5.

If the Task Force decides to accept something close to the new map, it will revert to what community groups asked for ten days ago—and the panel seemed willing to accept.

Then the pressure started, and the direction of the mapping changed, dramatically.

It seems unlikely that the powerful interests trying to gerrymander progressives out of office will give up after this setback.

So everything—in public anyway—will settle down for a week. Then the Task Force will meet again, at least once, facing a real deadline, and hammer out a final map.

But it won’t be quiet behind the scenes. We will keep you posted.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.
Sponsored link
Sponsored link

Featured

Six big stories you might not have seen in local news media in 2025

Everyone's talking about the biggest stories of 2025. Here are some that the local media ignored

In 2026, let’s not follow failed housing policies in progressive San Francisco

Housing First works. So why is SF siding with Trump to try do undo it?

Good Taste: 8 delicious reasons to welcome 2026

Ferry Building additions, Presidio newcomers, and a “no holds barred” supper club: next year is looking tasty already.

More by this author

Six big stories you might not have seen in local news media in 2025

Everyone's talking about the biggest stories of 2025. Here are some that the local media ignored

For more than half a century, the progressives in SF have been right—and the developers wrong

We have murals and books and movies celebrating the opponents of demolitions like the I-Hotel and redevelopment. What will we look back on 20 years from now?

PG&E offers more excuses, and will seek to delay and obfuscate over public power

Public power is cheaper, more reliable, and would make money for the city. Just look at the numbers
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED