Sponsored link
Friday, July 26, 2024

Sponsored link

PerformanceStage ReviewAt SF Ballet, two very different sides of 'British...

At SF Ballet, two very different sides of ‘British Icons’

Notoriously difficult, dissimilar pieces by Kenneth MacMillan and Frederick Ashton showed the company's versatility

It still isn’t clear what artistic vision defines Tamara Rojo’s first year as SF Ballet artistic director. If anything, her early tenure with the company has been marked by major shake-ups, including Rojo herself replacing her three-decade predecessor, as well as the departure of key dancers like Sarah van Patten. This new show marks the departure of another beloved dancer, this time stellar principal Yuan Yuan Tan.

Tan didn’t dance the opening night of British Icons (SF Ballet premiere through February 17 at the War Memorial Opera House, SF). She was replaced in her roles by Korean-born Wona Park (promoted to SFB principal in 2020) and Japanese-born Misa Kuranaga. In a way, the upstart dancers have as much to prove to patrons as their artistic director. Of course, their graceful execution of repeated on-pointe steps show that they have little to worry about in terms high expectations.

British Icons is the production of two pieces never before performed at SFB: the Kenneth MacMillan version of Anthony Tudor’s The Song of the Earth (based on the music of Mahler) and Frederick Ashton’s Marguerite and Armand (music by Franz Liszt). Both are notably challenging ballets by the late British choreographers, and seem to complement one another well when presented together: one, a story of Earthly spirits driven by passion; the other, a tale of equally-passionate lovers on the road to inevitable tragedy.

San Francisco Ballet in MacMillan’s ‘Song of the Earth.’ Photo by Reneff-Olson Productions

The story of Song of the Earth (such as it is) is of little concern. One needn’t know that Wei Wang’s ominous character in the Nicholas Georgiadis mask is meant to be the Spirit of Death any more than we need to know the dynamics of the ensemble members who break off into couples. The fact that our two leads are simply addressed in the program as “Man” (Isaac Hernández) and “Woman” (Park) lets us know that we’re meant to pick up everything we need on visuals alone. As staged on Georgiadis’ spartan set, the piece almost completely works. The talented dancers bring the necessary skill, and conductor Martin West knows his way around Mahler’s compositions.

What makes it awkward is the incorporation of two SF Opera veterans, tenor Moisés Salazar and mezzo Gabrielle Beteag. Their voices are fine, but their staging wasn’t thought through very well. The two switch-off scenes, standing at opposite ends of the downstage. Depending on where you’re seated, they’ll be blocking your view of the dancers on the far ends. Plus, the fact that they just stand there seems like a wasted opportunity. They needn’t be incorporated into the staging of the dancers, but they practically aren’t integrated at all. Still, the piece allows the audience to easily engage with its story.

San Francisco Ballet in Ashton’s Marguerite and Armand. Photo by Lindsey Rallo

It’s a bit more difficult to do so with Marguerite and Armand, which demands the audience already be familiar with the classic tale before observing the ballet. If not, you’ll figure out the eponymous leads (played opening night by Kuranaga and Joseph Walsh, respectively) by process of elimination, but you probably won’t know why everyone is angry, why money is insultingly thrown in someone’s face, or why the characters break up before reuniting in the climax. (Though, I assume everyone immediately picked up on Marguerite’s illness. At a certain point, one can go through several European stories and just assume everyone died of “consumption.”)

The piece works better as a showcase for Cecil Beaton’s sets and costumes, which are grand in the way Georgiadis’ were minimalist. Scene changes are signified by two floor-to-roof-length silk curtains pulled back and away from centerstage. Marguerite’s room looks like one giant bed frame draped in hanging linens. It’s definitely a triumph more of design and staging than storytelling.

Misa Kuranaga and Joseph Walsh in Ashton’s Marguerite and Armand // © Reneff-Olson Productions

As before, I went to the Opera House well-masked and wearing protective glasses for the now-mask-optional performances. Also as before, the Opera House’s grand spacing and HVAC systems—old and new—meant that my Aranet4’s CO² readings peaked around 719ppm during the two-hour show. Incidentally, I later wound up having an online conversation with a fellow SF Ballet aficionado about why the company hasn’t taken to streaming performances like their War Memorial co-residents, the SF Opera. Since all we could do was speculate, there’s no need to repeat what was said here. Suffice it to say, we both agreed that the Ballet is losing out on opportunities for both revenue and exposure by not following the Opera’s lead toward streaming.

As their patrons get older and/or susceptible to illness (particularly, the immune-compromised who haven’t been back in years), adapting to this new technological innovation is one bold change the Ballet’s new regime should be embracing. The reason we had this conversation was because we were discussing the Ballet’s last show, the tech-heavy Mere Mortals.

In her program notes, Rojo says she embraced the challenge that came with these two notoriously difficult ballets. It shows a wonderful confidence in her company that pays off in their performances. It’s to her credit that most of shortcomings of this two-parter lie in the original texts themselves. Yet, one continues to search for a grand artistic statement from SF Ballet’s new leader. The new season will bring such welcome changes as greater Latine representation in the creative process, to which I personally look forward. She doesn’t have to change the world right here and now, it’s just not yet clear what exactly she does plan to do.

BRITISH ICONS runs through February 15 at the War Memorial Opera House, SF. Tickets and further info here.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Charles Lewis III
Charles Lewis III
Charles Lewis III is a San Francisco-born journalist, theatre artist, and arts critic. You can find dodgy evidence of this at thethinkingmansidiot.wordpress.com

Sponsored link

Featured

Second City takes Berkeley Rep

Legendary Chicago improv company doesn't hesitate to remind you of its bona fides—but it's all well-deserved.

‘Groove’ is (still) in the heart

Raise your hands: Seminal 24-year-old film about the SF rave scene gets a fresh look at Vogue Theatre.

More by this author

What makes humans unique? ODC/Dance answers with fun and play

Forget AI and robotaxis. The joy and humor of movement were on full display in the company's 'Summer Sampler.'

Don’t cry for barebones ‘Evita’

SF Playhouse's spare production of the crowdpleaser could use some more fireworks, but it's still a bold move.

SF Mime Troupe’s ‘American Dream’: Palestine, AI, and those two old white guys

Ever topical, the troupe's annual free park show is one of the liveliest and most realized in years.
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED