Sponsored link
Tuesday, October 22, 2024

Sponsored link

HousingHomelessnessSupes to push measure keeping homeless hotels open

Supes to push measure keeping homeless hotels open

Proposal would set up another confrontation with the Mayor's Office over keeping unhoused safe during COVID.

-

Four supervisors are introducing legislation to keep open the Shelter-In-Place hotels, setting up another confrontation with the Mayor’s Office, which despite the rising COVID numbers and the onset of rain and cold weather is insisting on moving people out of the rooms.

Sup. Matt Haney is the primary sponsor of the legislation, which also has the support of Sups. Shamann Walton, Hillary Ronen and Dean Preston.

Sup. Matt Haney is pushing to keep the hotels open.

The details of the legislation aren’t clear yet, but Haney’s Office said the plan is to “counter the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing’s plan to shut down SIP hotels, and instead keep the hotels open for vulnerable unhoused populations during the COVID-19 pandemic.”

In fact, I am told, the bill will mandate that anyone moved out of a hotel have a lease on a new permanent place to live and a specific plan to exit homelessness.

And the Mayor’s Office would have to inform the supes of where each person was going.

It will also seek to move existing homeless people into any rooms that are vacated by people who have other housing solutions.

In other words, the supes want to keep the 2,400 rooms that are now under city leases open at least until the COVID crisis has passed.

That would also give the city the ability to move to buy these hotels if there’s money under the new administration.

The Mayor’s Office has in the past complained that the supes mandated hotel rooms without allocating money for them – although the vast, vast majority of the money for this program comes from the federal government. The entire cost to the city is around $3 million – to house 2,400 people.

But the supes could in theory allocate money to fund the program for the next few months. The mayor could then decline to spend it.

The voters made pretty clear in the November election that they sided with the progressives on the board. And right now, there are literally thousands of lives at stake.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.

Featured

Sholeh Asgary’s metamorphic ‘آبـان (Aban)’ slips from the haze of dreams

The Oakland installation artist's engrossing first album is full of insects, sirens, santur, and ghostly flickers of her voice.

Screen Grabs: Gaza, Sudan, LGBTQs find focus at Arab Film Fest

After its cancellation last year, the 28th annual cinematic dive into the Arab world and diaspora features 40+ films from 26 countries.

Brat, but Charli XCX wouldn’t let us cover it, so here’s our thoughts anyway

Her Sweat tour stop at Chase Center looked like a lot of fun—too bad the local queer press was stuck in the cold.

More by this author

As big-money ads drop, progressives work on GOTV efforts …

... Plus a test case for Breed's neighborhood upzoning efforts. That's The Agenda for Oct. 20-27

Supreme Court hints at sweeping ruling that could gut the Clean Water Act

San Francisco may have just handed the right-wing judges the ability to undermine decades of environmental law.

The race for second place is heating up in the SF mayor’s race—and it’s all about Farrell

Safai backs Farrell. Some progressives back Breed—just to oppose Farrell. The RCV strategy is emerging.
Sponsored link
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED