Sponsored link
Saturday, January 3, 2026

Sponsored link

News + PoliticsScott Wiener is using Sha'Carri Richardson's plight to raise money for his...

Scott Wiener is using Sha’Carri Richardson’s plight to raise money for his campaign

Fake 'petition' seeks to fill campaign coffers by hyping the struggles of a young athlete. It's the latest game in politics, and it's kind of gross.

-

One of the latest trends in political fundraising is the “petition.” I get them in my email all the time. They go like this:

“The Republicans are about to do something awful. Please sign this petition to oppose it (oh, and please give me money so I can run for Congress and try to stop them.)”

State Sen. Scott Wiener crossed a line with the use of Sha-Carri Richardson’s Olympic struggle to raise money for his campaign.

The petitions, everyone in the industry knows, aren’t actually petitions in the way most of us think of them. I’m not sure most of these “petitions” actually reach any decision-makers.

No: They’re about collecting names and email addresses for campaign organizing and fundraising.

Some of them are actually related to an issue that a candidate is working on. I just got one from Rep. Ro Khanna:

Hey Tim – did you see this important email about Ro taking on Exxon?

We launched a petition for everyday Americans to show their support for Ro as he takes on executives of Exxon Mobil Corporation, Shell, Chevron and other major oil and gas companies for their part in blocking climate legislation. Can you add your name now so Ro knows you’re with him in this fight to save our planet?

That takes you to a campaign page. The small print:

By signing this form, you are agreeing to receive occasional emails on this and related campaigns from Ro Khanna.

Okay: Khanna actually is taking on Exxon Mobil. He’s also raising money for his re-election, as all incumbent members of Congress do. It’s kind of a trick to tell people they are signing a petition when they’re really signing up for campaign solicitations, but this one doesn’t bother me that much.

Then there’s state Sen. Scott Wiener’s latest. It arrived yesterday.

Sponsored link

The headline: “Let Sha’Carri Run!”

The text:

Sha’Carri Richardson is one of a kind. She is sensational, ridiculously talented, and faster than any other American woman in her competition. 

She is also a 21-year-old whose mother just died. She used cannabis, which is legal in many places (including Oregon, where the Olympic trials were held and the test conducted), to help cope with her terrible loss.

She was all set to head to the Tokyo Olympics as a gold medal favorite, until she tested positive for marijuana. Because of the Olympics’ antiquated drug rules, she likely won’t get to compete.

Let’s be clear: using cannabis is not and should not be a crime. In fact, many atheletes (sic) use cannabis to help with pain and other chronic issues. It’s not a performance enhancing drug, and it makes no sense for Sha’Carri, or anyone, to be disqualified for using cannabis.

Will you sign on to our petition to show you think Sha’Carri Richardson should be able to run in the Olympics?

The link goes to a Re-Elect Scott Wiener campaign page. And right below it is a “donate” button that takes you not to any fund to help Richardson but to a link to donate to Wiener’s campaign.

This one, I think, crosses the line.

In essence, Wiener is using Richardson’s battle with the IOC for his own political purposes. He is not calling for hearings and hauling in the IOC or American Anti-Doping Agency officials. He — like almost every other politician in the Bay Area — has denounced the decision. But he has not introduced, as far as I know, any legislation that would in any way impact the regulation of cannabis in Olympic sports (and he can’t anyway – that’s far beyond the jurisdiction of the state Legislature).

No: What he’s doing, as one local consultant told me, is “pretty typical these days – News Hack the issue of the day to build a list.”

And in my mind, he’s exploiting the struggles of a young athlete to do it.

I emailed campaign consultant Maggie Muir, who has worked on his past campaign, yesterday and asked if she was running this one. I said I had a question about it.

She responded: “What is the question?” That at least suggests she is still involved with his campaign.

Here’s what I asked:

I have an email from Scott’s campaign that includes a petition related to Sha’Carri Richardson. My question: When people sign the petition, where does it go? Are those signatures collected to use for future contact/fundraising in the campaign? 

She has not responded. I called to follow up. She has not responded.

I texted Wiener to ask if he thought this was all okay, and if he had Richardson’s permission to use her name in his fundraising. He has not responded.

I will let you know if they do.

Meanwhile: Sorry, this is gross.

UPDATE: I just heard from Richardson’s agent, Renaldo Nehemia. He made it clear that Richardson did not give Wiener permission to use her name, and is not happy about this:

“The USATF has made their final team selections public, and my client was not added to the team. I respectfully ask that there will No use of Sha’Carri Richardson’s name or likeness in any fundraising endeavor for Senator Wiener.”

 Wiener’s campaign solicitation, it seems to me, is misleading at best. He’s suggesting that you can help Sha’Carri by signing a petition (you can’t) when what you are really doing is helping him raise money.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.
Sponsored link
Sponsored link

Featured

Drama Masks: Year on Stage 2025, part 2—the good stuff

When times got tough, our best artists got fierce: Golden Thread, OTP, Mime Troupe, Marga Gomez were standouts.

Six big stories you might not have seen in local news media in 2025

Everyone's talking about the biggest stories of 2025. Here are some that the local media ignored

In 2026, let’s not follow failed housing policies in progressive San Francisco

Housing First works. So why is SF siding with Trump to try do undo it?

More by this author

Six big stories you might not have seen in local news media in 2025

Everyone's talking about the biggest stories of 2025. Here are some that the local media ignored

For more than half a century, the progressives in SF have been right—and the developers wrong

We have murals and books and movies celebrating the opponents of demolitions like the I-Hotel and redevelopment. What will we look back on 20 years from now?

PG&E offers more excuses, and will seek to delay and obfuscate over public power

Public power is cheaper, more reliable, and would make money for the city. Just look at the numbers
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED