Sponsored link
Thursday, September 28, 2023

Sponsored link

News + PoliticsPolicePolice Commission considers dramatic changes in racist traffic stops (with Breed opposed)

Police Commission considers dramatic changes in racist traffic stops (with Breed opposed)

If a slim 4-3 majority holds, SF could take the national lead in addressing pattern of cops stopping and hassling Black and Brown motorists.


We got a little clue about the politics of the new Board of Supes today when the board voted 7-4 to confirm Cindy Elias to another four-year term on the Police Commission.

The move comes a day before the commission is set to adopt a new policy limiting so-called “pretext” stops used by the cops to hassle Black and Brown motorists.

The cops in their cars pull over a high percentage of Black and Brown drivers for minor offenses.

Mayor London Breed was unhappy that Elias became commission president, and doesn’t want the panel to adopt the reforms, which Elias has consistently supported.

Sup. Matt Dorsey, who had been appointed by the mayor before winning a full term in November, said he wanted to see more police activity around arresting dealers of Fentanyl, and that he wanted to see the drugs confiscated and the dealers off the streets. Because he said he didn’t see Elias as an ally in that effort, he wasn’t going to support her.

Sup. Myrna Melgar then noted that the Police Commission doesn’t set sentencing guidelines for convicted criminals, nor does the commission determine who is released while awaiting trial.

The vote: Dorsey, newly elected Sup. Joel Engardio, Sup. Rafael Mandelman, and Sup. Catherine Stefani all voted No. The remainder, including Sup. Ahsha Safai, who often votes with the more conservative members, voted to confirm.

Worth noting that Safai, by all accounts, is considering a challenge to Mayor London Breed next year.

Meanwhile, the Police Commission, which has four appointees of the mayor and three appointees of the supes, is set Wednesday/8 to vote on what advocates call “the most comprehensive policy in the country to address racially-biased traffic stops.”

The policy would bar the local cops from using minor issues—say, a license plate that isn’t property attached—from pulling a driver over and then seeking to search the person or the vehicle.

It goes further: The policy would ban SF cops from some types of low-level traffic stops, since most of the people stopped under those codes are Black and Brown.

Serious traffic violations, like speeding, failing to yield to pedestrians, running stop signs or red lights—the stuff that actually poses a threat to public safety—aren’t impacted by the policy:

Let’s start with some basics here: the policy that some commissioners are promoting are neither radical nor out of step with the data or with what other communities are doing.

It aims to take the cops, to the extent possible, out of traffic enforcement, since the data on that is very clear: Of the moving violations SF cops issued in the past few years, the overwhelming number have gone to Black and Latino drivers.

At the Police Commission last week, Jacob Denney, who is the economic justice policy director at SPUR (and before you gasp at his current affiliation, which does not have a history of supporting economic justice, Denney has a long and distinguished career in the field), presented devastating data:

Black drivers are five times more likely than white drivers to be stopped for a traffic violation, and most of the time there is no actual citation issued (that is, the cops just pull the drivers over and hassle them but find no legal ground to write a ticket). Most Black traffic stops involve minor issues like improperly displaced license plates; most white people are only stopped for things like speeding and failure to yield to pedestrians—violations that could actually hurt someone.

Four of the commission members have supported the new policy, including Elias, who is the president; Max Carter-Oberstone, who is a Breed appointee but a leader in advocating for the new rules, will be at a press conference Wednesday morning with more than 100 community groups and leaders urging the panel to vote for the changes.

The commission meeting starts at 5:30pm.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.

Top reads

Live Shots: The agony and the ecstasy of Folsom Street Fair 2023

A more relaxed vibe this year, but freak flags still flew high. View our unbridled pics

Welcome to Best of the Bay 2023!

Thousands voted in our 49th annual Readers' Poll, celebrating the best place on Earth. Here are the results.

Best of the Bay 2023: Arts & Nightlife Winners

READERS' POLL: Best Nightclub, Best Art Gallery, Best Drag Queen, Best Karaoke, Best Live Venue, Best DJ, more

More by this author

Breed looks for political points by finding more ways to punish poor people

The latest: Drug testing for welfare recipients, which will never work and probably never happen. Do we live in San Francisco or Texas?

A chron oped on the housing hearing is wrong, and signals a new attack on the supes

Board members asked for a modest delay to consider the mayor's amendments to a complex housing bill. The Chron talks of "Nimbys."

How will the city implement forced treatment for people with mental illness?

Plus: Does the Mayor's Office have a real homelessness plan—and what's going to happen new to Laguna Honda Hospital? That's The Agenda this week
Sponsored link
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED