Sponsored link
Saturday, December 27, 2025

Sponsored link

Democratic Party calls for Airbnb to pay its taxes

Resolution seeks to mandate that short-term rental companies cough up millions in back levies

David Campos and Meagan Levitan, sponsors of the Airbnb resolution
David Campos and Meagan Levitan, sponsors of the Airbnb resolution

By Tim Redmond

JANUARY 29, 2015 – The San Francisco Democratic Party voted unanimously last night to demand that Airbnb and other short-term rental hosting companies pay their back taxes, after Treasurer Jose Cisneros told the panel he had no problem with the measure.

Cisneros didn’t endorse the measure, but he confirmed to me that “I am always in support of people telling people to pay their taxes.”

The approval came after Sup. Scott Wiener tried to substitute a different resolution, with lots of language praising the legislation by then-Sup David Chiu that legalized short-term rentals.

Wiener, with the support of Assemblymember Chiu’s proxy, argued that a strong resolution calling on Airbnb to pay its back taxes might be used to promote legislation by Sup. David Campos that would condition legalization on the payment.

But Committee Member Bevan Dufty offered his own amended resolution – “If Scott can amend the whole thing then so can I” – that took most of the original language with a few tweaks.

When it was clear that the Dufty version had widespread support, Wiener backed down and went along.

Taxpayer privacy laws prevent Cisneros from saying whether Airbnb has paid what it owes. But if the company was fully square with the city, it’s likely we would know that: Airbnb is free to say it’s paid all it owes.

Among the most interesting moments: Matt Dorsey, who in his day job works as a press aide to City Attorney, noted that when the bill to legalize short-term rental was passed, “we had a moment of leverage.”

At that point, he said, the city could have said: You are doing something illegal, and we are going to give you permission to do it – but first, pay up your back taxes. The supervisors failed to do that – which is why this is still an issue.

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram

Sponsored link

Sponsored link
Sponsored link

Latest

Drama Masks: Year on Stage 2025, part 1—the not-so-great stuff

A year of devastating cuts, wild uncertainty, and unexpected departures left its mark on the SF scene.

Under the Stars: Noise Pop’s latest scores? Jay Som, Giraffage, CupcakKe, Open Eagle Mike…

Plus: A perfect, purple way to spend NYE, RIP Jellybean Johnson of the Time, Say She She, Altın Gün, more music news.

Screen Grabs: Triumph of the pencil-‘stached uber weasel

Timothée Chalamet scores in 'Marty Supreme.' Plus: Park Chan-wook takes on vulture capitalism, and 1941 'Texas' returns.

SF could move to take over PG&E’s system right now, if city officials had the political will

We don't need a new state bill or more hearings. The city could start the public power process immediately—and send a powerful message to the state

You might also likeRELATED