Sponsored link
Tuesday, February 11, 2025

Sponsored link

News + PoliticsPG&E Scam warning

PG&E Scam warning

That ballot measure gathering signatures for “clean power” is actually an attack on CleanPowerSF, sponsored by PG&E allies

48hillspgande

By Tim Redmond

JUNE 29, 2105 – There were people on the streets gathering signatures for two ballot measure this weekend – and some confusion. Apparently the same company that was hired to put the Mission Moratorium on the ballot is also working for PG&E’s union in its efforts to screw up CleanPowerSF.

So the person I ran into in the Mission asked me to sign both for “affordable housing” and “clean energy.”

One is true. The other is a scam.

The Mission Moratorium is sponsored by community leaders concerned about the lack of affordable housing and the massive displacement that’s happening in the community.

The “clean energy” measure is sponsored by the IBEW Local 1245 and signed by IBEW leader Hunter Stern.  It sounds fine – it says that the city would be required to disclose how much of its CleanPowerSF energy is from truly renewable sources.

But according the city attorney, the measure also:

would also prohibit the City from engaging in any form of advertising or marketing, or from making any public statement, that the electricity it is supplying or will supply in a CCA program is “clean,” “green,” or any similar term, unless the electricity is “renewable, greenhouse gas-free electricity” under the measure.

It’s impossible to start a clean energy public-power program with 100 percent greenhouse-gas free electricity. That’s why PG&E’s allies (and IBEW 1245 has always, always sided with the utility against public power) are doing this. It’s a clear attack on public power.

Remember: PG&E claims to be starting up a clean-power option, but at least 20 percent of the utility’s power comes from a nuclear plant at Diablo Canyon. Is that “greenhouse gas-free?” Some people might argue that. Is it “green?” Not by any standard.

It’s too bad that the measures are together – and that PG&E’s allies are using the term “clean power” to prevent the city from moving forward with clean power.

Just be warned: One ballot measure is a real grassroots effort. The other is a PG&E scam.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.

Sponsored link

Sponsored link
Sponsored link

Featured

Live Shots: Thee Sacred Souls showed ‘love is the way’ at The Masonic

The San Diego outfit's satiny smooth soul and throwback R&B jams brought sweet, swaying vibes in a dark time.

Screen Grabs: Diving into the ingenious ‘race films’ of Oscar Micheaux

Black History Month resurrects the 20th-century auteur. Plus: Sly Stone, Fantastic Negrito, and Captain America

Supes forward measure to let developers build luxury housing with no affordable fees

SOMA groups denounce plan, but Land Use Committee sends it to full board on 2-1 vote.

More by this author

Two housing measures would give massive breaks to private developers

Plus: How is Mayor Lurie going to fund Muni? That's The Agenda for Feb. 9-16

A project almost nobody wants is going forward in the Mission, thanks to Yimbys

60 low-tenants displaced by fire (one dead); now landlord gets to build luxury condos—only because of Wiener and his allies in Sacramento.

Full board will hear Lurie’s attempt to fire pro-reform police commissioner

Mandelman calls for Committee of the Whole to consider whether to allow the mayor to oust Max Carter Oberstone

You might also likeRELATED