Sponsored link
Wednesday, April 24, 2024

Sponsored link

News + PoliticsPG&E Scam warning

PG&E Scam warning

That ballot measure gathering signatures for “clean power” is actually an attack on CleanPowerSF, sponsored by PG&E allies

48hillspgande

By Tim Redmond

JUNE 29, 2105 – There were people on the streets gathering signatures for two ballot measure this weekend – and some confusion. Apparently the same company that was hired to put the Mission Moratorium on the ballot is also working for PG&E’s union in its efforts to screw up CleanPowerSF.

So the person I ran into in the Mission asked me to sign both for “affordable housing” and “clean energy.”

One is true. The other is a scam.

The Mission Moratorium is sponsored by community leaders concerned about the lack of affordable housing and the massive displacement that’s happening in the community.

The “clean energy” measure is sponsored by the IBEW Local 1245 and signed by IBEW leader Hunter Stern.  It sounds fine – it says that the city would be required to disclose how much of its CleanPowerSF energy is from truly renewable sources.

But according the city attorney, the measure also:

would also prohibit the City from engaging in any form of advertising or marketing, or from making any public statement, that the electricity it is supplying or will supply in a CCA program is “clean,” “green,” or any similar term, unless the electricity is “renewable, greenhouse gas-free electricity” under the measure.

It’s impossible to start a clean energy public-power program with 100 percent greenhouse-gas free electricity. That’s why PG&E’s allies (and IBEW 1245 has always, always sided with the utility against public power) are doing this. It’s a clear attack on public power.

Remember: PG&E claims to be starting up a clean-power option, but at least 20 percent of the utility’s power comes from a nuclear plant at Diablo Canyon. Is that “greenhouse gas-free?” Some people might argue that. Is it “green?” Not by any standard.

It’s too bad that the measures are together – and that PG&E’s allies are using the term “clean power” to prevent the city from moving forward with clean power.

Just be warned: One ballot measure is a real grassroots effort. The other is a PG&E scam.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.

Sponsored link

Featured

After ‘painful’ preparation, ‘Blue Door’ opens onto Black men’s complex life in US

Director Darryl V. Jones on creating the soundtrack of generational haunting at Aurora Theatre Company

Matmos drops in for tea and jockstraps

Radical sound-collage duo dish on roots in SF's wild '90s nightlife scene as debut 'In Lo-Fidelity' hits 30.

Good Taste: Getting flaky at Smörgåsland

The pastry-stacked promise of IKEA’s new bakery and food hall in downtown SF.

More by this author

Is protesting in traffic ‘false imprisonment?’

Then what about Waymo blocking a highway entrance ramp?

New conservative DCCC members will face vote on critical labor issues

Will the 'moderate' majority elected with tech money support bills that regulate AI, robotaxis, and robotrucks?

SF once again fails women who report sexual assault

Ronen asks: Why have the cops done nothing since 2021 on allegations by three women that they were assaulted by Jon Jacobo?
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED