Sponsored link
Tuesday, June 6, 2023

Sponsored link

News + PoliticsHousingCastro eviction battle shows total failure of state housing laws

Castro eviction battle shows total failure of state housing laws

The abuse of the Ellis Act is a total disgrace—and the city needs to move faster to buy at-risk buildings, protesters say.


The utter failure of California housing law was on display today on 19th Street, where 20 residents of a rent-controlled building, many of them LGBTQ and Asian seniors, were fighting to save their homes from speculators who seeking to profit by evicting them under the Ellis Act.

The building at 3661 19th Street was bought in 2018 by a group of investors who have a record of buying rent-controlled properties, tossing out the tenants, and flipping them as tenancies in common—in essence, condos.

The players in this operation, according to records on file with the state and the city, are Jeff Pollack and Ryan Fong of Redwood City and Pierre Malak, who appears to live in San Jose.

Paul Mooney denounces the speculators who are trying to evict him

They have served tenants with Ellis Act papers, meaning they want to “go out of the business” of being landlords.

But of course, they just recently bought the building; if they didn’t want to be landlords, they had no reason to buy it.

No: As Deepa Varma, a longtime tenant activist now working for Tenants Together, said at the event, there is no reason for this to happen at all–except “greed.”

Deepa Varma says there is no excuse for the Ellis Act except “greed.”

The investors paid $6.3 million for the property, about $500,000 a unit. If they can get rid of the tenants and flip the units, they will almost certainly get $1 million each, in essence doubling their money by destroying the tenants’ lives.

Larry Kuester, who described himself as a gay senior, has been living in the building for 31 years. “The only reason I can stay here is rent control,” he said. “This inhuman corporation is about to evict seniors and working-class people. I am afraid I am going to end up homeless.”

Paul Mooney, a longtime LGBTQ activist who helped found the anti-racist group And Castro For All, has been living in the building for 18 years. “The owners are speculators,” he said. “Seven of these units are LGBTQ tenants who have been here for decades.”

Sup. Rafael Mandelman supports spending more city money to buy at-risk buildings like this one.

He said the community should work to push the owners to sell the property to a nonprofit so it can remain rent-controlled housing.

Sup. Rafael Mandelman spoke at the rally and said he agreed that the city needs to put up the money to buy buildings like this one. “We need to buy these properties,” he said, noting that Sup. Dean Preston is asking the board to set aside $64 million in Prop. I money to purchase properties at risk for speculation and evictions and that he supports the approach.

Buying this building for $6.3 million would be far cheaper than building 12 new units of affordable housing. I don’t understand why the Mayor’s Office hasn’t been more aggressive about this; the supes are willing to put up the money, and there are plenty of nonprofit and land-trust groups that can hold the title and manage the place without forcing out the tenants.

Mandelman made another point, though: The Ellis Act is creating a “cancer on the city,” with evictions of tenants who have done nothing wrong. “D8 is ground zero for no-fault evictions,” he said.

And the city’s representatives in the state Legislature need to do better. Repealing, or at least reforming, the Ellis Act “has to be the thing in Sacramento,” he said. Our representatives need to make it clear that “any time someone wants their vote for something,” Ellis Act repeal has to be part of the discussion.

State Sen. Scott Wiener has made a huge deal of trying to address the state’s housing crisis. He hasn’t made Ellis Act repeal even a modest part of his agenda.

But Assemblymember Alex Lee (D-San Jose) has a bill, AB 854, that would mandate a landlord who buys a building operate it as a rental for five years before invoking the Ellis Act. Lee’s office notes that “there has been a trend of serial evictors who evict tenants from multiple buildings.”

It’s stuck in the Housing and Community Development Committee, which was chaired by San Francisco’s David Chiu, who is now the city attorney.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.

Top reads

The brutal cuts in the Breed budget

Child care, housing for youth, code enforcement, the Food Bank ... all are facing the axe as cops get more and big landlords get tax breaks.

Maybe, finally, a decision on the Castro Theater

Plus: Do we have too many pot stores in SF? And a developer giveaway that can cost the schools millions. That's The Agenda for June 4-11

Screen Grabs: Pride—and queer film—is busting out all over

From John Waters and Gay Girls Riding Club to International Male, rainbow celluloid season heats up

More by this author

Should developers bulldoze 100,000 houses on the west side of town?

It's not an idle question. It's part of the mayor's housing agenda. And it's not going to lead to more affordability.

Promoter’s plans for Castro Theater move forward on 6-4 supes vote

Now the final decision on APE's renovations moves to the Historic Preservation and Planning Commission Thursday.

The brutal cuts in the Breed budget

Child care, housing for youth, code enforcement, the Food Bank ... all are facing the axe as cops get more and big landlords get tax breaks.
Sponsored link
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED