Sponsored link
Friday, January 16, 2026

Sponsored link

City HallThe AgendaFull board to consider police spy cameras

Full board to consider police spy cameras

Plus: Mayor's mystery Planning Commission nominee finally has a hearing. That's The Agenda for Sept. 18-25.

-

A proposal that would allow the SF police to use private cameras to spy on residents in real time comes before the full Board of Supes Tuesday/20.

The measure, sponsored by the mayor, cleared the Rules Committee 2-1 last week, with Sup. Connie Chan in opposition. Sups. Aaron Peskin and Rafael Mandelman voted in favor.

Sup. Connie Chan opposed the camera plan. Photo by Ebbe Roe Yovino-Smith

Unless those two change their minds, the mayor needs only four more board members to put the policy in place.

It’s strongly opposed by many civil-liberties advocates, who say that warrantless video surveillance is a threat to privacy. The cops say that’s not a big concern since any use of private camera footage would have to be approved by a captain—as if a police captain is going to turn down this sort of request.

That meeting starts at 2pm.

Conditional-use requirements for housing are the bane of the Yimby world. When conditional use is required, the Planning Commission has to approve a project, even if it otherwise meets zoning codes. That, critics say, can add unnecessary delays to projects.

But Sups. Aaron Peskin and Connie Chan are proposing a new conditional-use rule that will be hard for anyone to oppose: They want to require those special hearings for any project in some parts of town that doesn’t maximize the density of housing.

The idea is to make it harder for very rich people to build giant single-family homes where a multi-unit project could work instead.

The measure also continues limits on the demolition of any structure that includes multiple flats. It will also be at the full board.

The Rules Committee takes up a string of mayoral appointments Monday/19, including filling a vacant seat on the Planning Commission. Breed’s nominee for the crucial swing-vote seat is Derek Braun, who works as a consultant in the East Bay and as far as I can tell, has no record at all of any land-use work or advocacy in San Francisco.

He doesn’t have much of any history of community activism, and it’s not clear why Breed is nominating him.

We may get a bit more of a clue when he testifies at the committee. That meeting starts at 10am.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.
Sponsored link
Sponsored link

Featured

So what if the billionaires leave California?

A member of Patriotic Millionaires says the rich probably won't flee a new wealth tax—but we might be better off if some of them did

As Trump threatens Cuba, a solidarity visit shows the impact of US sanctions

Even Cuban Olympic hopefuls are cut off from qualifying events

Mosswood Meltdown’s full lineup drops: Dead Milkmen, Iggy Pop, Bikini Kill aboard

Otoboke Beaver, Frightwig, Scowl, The Dirtbombs, many others kick July Oakland punk fest into the stratosphere

More by this author

So what if the billionaires leave California?

A member of Patriotic Millionaires says the rich probably won't flee a new wealth tax—but we might be better off if some of them did

Should I sign that petition? A handy guide to the clipboards you’re seeing on the streets

Make sure you know who is funding the the ballot measures before you sign.

Why did SF arrest and prosecute a 67-year-old for selling mushrooms at a Phish concert?

Mayor Lurie proudly celebrated SF's psychedelic era; why are his cops doing buy-busts at concerts when there is a fentanyl crisis on the streets?
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED