Sponsored link
Sunday, March 16, 2025

Sponsored link

UncategorizedFBI has to release surveillance documents

FBI has to release surveillance documents

Federal judge says that spying on Muslim and Arab communities may have no legitimate law-enforcement purpose

Large parts of FBI documents were redacted using an exemption that a federal judge found invalid
Large parts of FBI documents were redacted using an exemption that a federal judge found invalid

By Tim Redmond

MARCH 24, 2015 – In a major victory for open government, a federal judge has ruled that the FBI can’t user a blanket “law-enforcement” exemption to keep secret records about its surveillance programs.

Judge Richard Seeborg ruled that much of the intelligence-gathering the feds have used to collect information on Muslim communities in the Bay Area had no fvalid law-enforcement purpose.

That means documents related to that surveillance can’t be kept secret under the law-enforcement exemption to the Freedom of Information Act.

The ruling comes in a five-year-old case filed by the ACLU, the Asian Law Caucus and the now-shuttered Bay Guardian seeking records of FBI spying activities.

The documents already released show alarming patterns of abuse: The FBI routinely engaged in racial profiling and used training materials with derogatory stereotypes of Muslim and Arab Americans.

The documents showed, as the Guardian reported in 2012, that “The FBI’s modern snoop program is racist, xenophobic, misdirected, dangerous — and really, really stupid.”

Sponsored link

Help us save local journalism!

Every tax-deductible donation helps us grow to cover the issues that mean the most to our community. Become a 48 Hills Hero and support the only daily progressive news source in the Bay Area.

Among other things, those materials contained statements like “The Arab mind is a Cluster thinker, while the Western mind tends to be a linear thinker” and that Islam “alleviated some of the weaknesses that inflicted the Arab mind.”

The legal brief filed by the ACLU, with the cooperation of the law firm Morrison and Foerster, points out that the FBI has moved significantly away from its original mission of law enforcement, and has directed resources away from crime fighting and into its domestic spy programs.

The agency has released more than 50,000 pages of documents to the ACLU, but in many cases, key elements of those records have been withheld or redacted.

The law allows federal agencies to keep secret documents directly related to law enforcement activities. But as the ACLU argued in court, if the FBI spy program has no credible relationship to any valid law-enforcement purpose, that exemption shouldn’t apply.

Judge Seeborg agreed. The agency could not demonstrate any rational connection between parts of its domestic surveillance program and any law-enforcement need, he wrote – which means that exemption to the FOIA act is invalid:

Because the FBI’s explanation of the link between its law enforcement activities and the particular documents withheld fails to meet the [applicable] ‘rational nexus’ standard . . ., the FBI is altogether precluded from withholding information under [the law enforcement exemption].

Now the agency will have to meet with the plaintiffs and work out agreements on further disclosure that may shed more light on the domestic surveillance program and its tactics.

And while the ruling is only a district court decision, and thus sets no formal precedent, it confirms that spying is often different from legitimate law enforcement and may help further efforts to shed light on current FBI activities that involve the surveillance of American citizens who are not suspected of any specific crime.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.

Sponsored link

Sponsored link

Featured

A tsunami of chaos and destruction, but there may be hope

There's a car salesman in the White House and an evil billionaire in your Social Security file, yet cracks are starting to show.

What’s on next at the Trump Center for the Performing Arts (besides more booing)?

Buckle up for wrestling matches, rare earth mineral mining, and an extrajudicial spin on 'Mack the Knife'

DJ FLOW’s Saturday night sets spin Bay Area hip-hop mixshow tradition

102.1 Jams' new radio star has serious talent—and local influences starting with 1980s Filipino mobile crews.

More by this author

Lurie won’t commit to an alternative approach to the opioid crisis

Mayor doubles down on law enforcement, rejects Fielder's call for a 'Four Pillars' approach that has worked in other cities

How is SF going to approach drug dealing? There are very different proposals

Plus: A report on police misconduct, and a documentary on the vulture capital firm that is destroying local news. That's The Agenda for March 9-16

After Newsom abandons trans people, a fairly tepid response at SF City Hall

Local officials were surprisingly cautious about responding to the governor's alarming (and inaccurate) statements.

You might also likeRELATED