Thursday, October 29, 2020
News + Politics The latest nasty -- and inaccurate -- attack on Chesa Boudin

The latest nasty — and inaccurate — attack on Chesa Boudin

No, the DA's Office did not release a burglary suspect who went on to attempt a rape.

-

The day Chesa Boudin was elected San Francisco district attorney, I got ready: It wouldn’t be more than a few months before the news media started to attack someone who is leading the way on criminal-justice reform.

It’s the Willie Horton Complex, and it’s how so much of the media (still) works: You save the lives of 100 young people by keeping them out of the carceral system and giving them a second chance, you promote policies that focus on alternatives to incarceration, you make restorative justice work — and the press pays no attention.

DA Chesa Boudin is under attack from the news media again.

But one person goes and commits a terrible crime, and it’s front-page news.

And as is often the case with media attacks on the progressive movement, I figured the facts would be casualties.

The Chron started off almost as soon at Boudin took office. Now, the assault is coming from a neighborhood paper.

I am not surprised that a columnist for the Marina Times, Lou Barberini, who is a retired police officer, would try to portray the DA as soft on crime.

But I was a bit stunned by his recent piece that essentially argued that Boudin allowed a man accused of burglary to be released from jail who later “traumatized a young girl.”

This is serious stuff: Barberini claims that Boudin “released a [burglary] suspect into the public” who later went on to commit a serious crime:

“This time,” he wrote, “the victim was a juvenile girl at home by herself when she found the Market Street burglar “exposing himself and engaging in sexual gratification” in her living room. The burglar ‘approached the young girl in her bedroom, attempted to physically control her and block her escape.’  The girl was able to escape the room and call her father who returned home and controlled the burglar until SFPD arrived.” 

He continued: “Think about the lasting trauma imposed on this poor girl because of Boudin. Does she lose sleep at night?  Does it affect her schoolwork? When she is in her living room does she relive the ordeal? Is she afraid to go outside by herself?  Will this affect her future relationships with men?”

It sounds just horrible. The problem is that Barberini’s account is not true.

Barberini cites no sources for his assertion that Boudin somehow released this suspect from jail. But there is a clear record on what happened, and the DA’s Office provided it to me:

The suspect in this case was arrested at about 12:45 am on June 1st and charged with felony burglary. He had allegedly broken into a store. He was booked into the county jail at 1am.

The next day, as is very common and has been common in the city for years, he went through an evaluation to determine if he should be held on bail or released on a promise to appear in court.

The duty judge, following a widely accepted protocol, decided this suspect was not a threat to the public or a threat to flee. He was released June 2, at 2:45 am.

The District Attorney’s Office had nothing to do with this. Nothing.

In fact, the DA’s Office doesn’t typically get police reports and file charges until 24 to 48 hours after an arrest.

In this case, Tuesday morning, June 2, the DA filed felony charges against the suspect. But by then, he was already out of jail.

His arraignment was set for June 5. He never showed up.

At that point, a judge issued a warrant for his arrest. SFPD doesn’t prioritize bench warrants, so he stayed on the streets – although the cops could have brought him in at any time.

When he was arrested for the later event, Boudin charged him with multiple felonies and asked the court to deny bail. Which happened. The suspect is now in jail, and will likely serve a long prison term.

I contacted Barberini, and his editor Susan Reynolds, and we had a long email conversation this weekend. At first both of them accused me of working on behalf of the DA. Then Barberini wrote:

“Please let me know:  Was an assistant district attorney present in the court room when the defendant was released?”

It’s clear whatever his unnamed sources were, they didn’t understand the process. There was no courtroom, no assistant DA; the man was released by a duty judge, under well-established rules, before the case ever got to the DA’s Office.

I gave Barberini all the information that I got from the DA, and asked both him and his editor if they agreed that the headline and the story were inaccurate.

 Reynolds: “The DA proudly says he doesn’t want to prosecute people. You know I’ve been critical of judges (I even wrote a column about it) and think they’re a huge key, but we all know the DA has more power than you are claiming and it’s ridiculous to say he doesn’t.”

Barberini: “If my article is incorrect, why doesn’t Boudin officially refute it?” 

Well, he did. In a statement to me, Boudin said:

“It is disappointing to see articles that promote the negatives, rely on faulty alleged data, and cite no sources for their claims. These kinds of stories promote fear mongering and misunderstanding in the public. They also undermine our ability to keep the public safe by perpetuating falsehoods and promoting distrust.”

I pressed: This story and headline are just wrong. All journalists make mistakes; will the Marina Times correct this one?

Reynolds never answered the question; she told me that she doesn’t like Boudin’s policies. Which is fine; we can disagree about criminal-justice policy, and the city is better off if we have media outlets with different points of view.

But to accuse a public official of damaging a young girl’s life on the basis of inaccurate facts is not okay.

Barberini said: “No, I will definitely not change the title of my article. Good luck with your story.  I already have outlined a rebuttal.”  

I look forward to it.

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.

5 COMMENTS

  1. Thank you for this article. Being DA is a hard enough job without so-called journalists publishing lies about you.

  2. Campers,

    For reasons unknown to me, 48 Hills is loggin me on as may daughter.

    I am ‘h. brown’ and she don’t need my baggage.

    Does this get to y’all?

    h.

  3. He could also take the Bill Barr approach to justice and start an execution rampage. more federal prisoners have been put to death in the last two months than in the last twenty years and there are two more executions coming up. Its very disturbing and despotic. We need to prepare in case Mr Barr tries to crucify people on the White House front lawn.

  4. Chesa Boudin needs to sue all the police officers, all the journalists, and anyone who speaks or thinks poorly of him. He needs to take total control of the government and throw in jail anyone who disagrees with him. He needs to release the criminals, because they are unfairly victimized by our racist sexist Donald Trump run government and put people in jail who voted for Trump or anyone else that happens to be near by. Cops are terrible people who need to be arrestd. All SFPD are white cismales who use POC for target practice

  5. I saw this article mentioned on either SFGate or the Chronicle web site. I thought it was a bit odd, and pointed that out. Thanks for providing this. It was definitely a poorly written article that seemed questionable at best. Good to know it was an outright fraud. Boudin is regularly falsely attacked. It is claimed he will not prosecute anyone. Seriously? If that were actually true, it would be a banner headline in the Chronicle.

More by this author

Big Money’s racist attacks in D7

Plus: School Board members of color get threatening online messages. Is this really San Francisco in 2020?

The biased coverage and real story around Lowell High and school renaming

Attention Chronicle: A lottery for the 'elite' school is neither new nor a radical idea -- and neither is discussing changing the names of schools celebrating racists and colonialists.

State billionaires saw vast windfall since COVID

While millions suffer, 161 rich people take in $312 billion -- and nobody in Sacramento seems to care.

Fear — and hope — for journalism

So many bad things happening to local news media -- which is why we are trying to make a difference.

Another big-money anti-tax front group emerges in SF

The Chamber of Commerce and GOP donors have created Fed UP SF to attack progressive taxes.

You might also likeRELATED