Sponsored link
Sunday, May 10, 2026

Sponsored link

News + PoliticsOpinionElon, what are you doing hurting your own interests?

Elon, what are you doing hurting your own interests?

And open letter to Musk: Trump is not a fan of electric cars. Oh, and you could give the Twitter HQ to climate action groups.

-

First of all, congratulations are in order. I see that Joe Biden announced his withdrawal from the presidential race on X (formerly Twitter), your Internet message service. Kamala Harris has also posted messages on X. You may not be partial to some of their political programs, but they seem to be two of your clients.

I don’t see why you are giving the Trump campaign $45 million a month. He claims to be a billionaire himself.

I can see you supporting Harris (formerly of Biden-Harris) in other ways, too. I say this out of concern for your future as well as mine.  

Dude: You want Trump, or you want to make money?

First of all, my advice (close their account!) will save you $45 million a month. I can understand why you might support candidates who promise to cut your taxes again. You may even agree with their opposition to women’s choice, their refusal to ban assassination weapons, and their plan to deport millions of hardworking immigrants.

But why support a candidate (Trump) who vehemently opposes this country’s transition to electric vehicles? Trump’s vow to “drill, baby, drill” if elected favors gasoline-fueled, carbon-emitting cars over electric-battery charged engines, and one way or another that means fewer Teslas sold, as Trump’s policy reduces public support for renewable energy and your kind of car.  

Would it not be in your interest to redirect that $45 million a month to activists and electoral candidates who oppose climate catastrophe? If you don’t want to spend that much, could you at least say a few words in favor of green energy, advocate alternatives to fossil fuel, and call for multi-party endorsement of electric vehicles?

Continuing to keep your interests in mind, and having a small personal stake in keeping the planet’s air breathable, I also propose that you reconsider the plan to move X (formerly Twitter) headquarters from downtown San Francisco to Austin, Texas. Your sudden, recent announcement suggests you’ve had it with our city, its politicians, if not its driverless cars (which are mostly Waymos, not Teslas), and you’re willing to endure Texan heat waves and floods rather than house a company’s headquarters in cool, occasionally foggy San Francisco.  Some people might even imagine you’d prefer to live on Mars, where Space X is preparing to transport colonizers.

But I see another possibility. From my admittedly limited information derived from gossip columns, I gather you like to be unpredictable, wayward if not eccentric. For that reason, I’m offering you an opportunity to confound all your liberal critics (myself included), and show your openness to innovation, cool climates and outspoken campaigns against fossil fuel.

Sponsored link

If you must vacate the San Francisco X building, how about turning it over free of charge to green activists and give them millions? It would win you and your beneficiaries considerable attention in the press, possible “likes” from Sunrise, 350.org, even Bill McKibbon.   Editorials would begin to ask if you’re suddenly turning liberal, or smoking too much weed, or finally discovering where your best interests and the planet’s coincide.  I want to say you can’t buy publicity like that – but you can!

Joel Schechter is the author of several books on satire. 

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Joel Schechter
Joel Schechter
Joel Schechter is the author of several books about satire, including 'Durov’s Pig', 'Satiric Impersonations', and 'The Congress of Clowns'.
Sponsored link
Sponsored link

Featured

Looking for trustworthy health info? Here are six sites that cut through the noise

Mass media, caught in a tsunami of cutbacks and misinformation, is dropping the ball on accurate reporting.

San Francisco could tax the rich—locally—and avoid brutal cuts to city services. Here’s how

Plus: Will the supes call for public power, now? Why are we bailing out the privatized zoo? That's The Agends for May 10-17

The complete failure of Lurie’s tax cuts for developers on full display at hearing

Cutting fees won't bring more affordable housing; it just makes the budget problem even worse

More by this author

What if Tom Steyer wasn’t a billionaire any more?

If he gave away most of his fortune to good causes in the next few weeks, he could say he's not just a rich guy running for governor.

The US war economy and the ‘threat of peace’

In 1957, I.F. Stone suggested that global peace would kill the military industrial complex. That's even more true today.

SF protests against war on Iran draw cries to “Send Barron’

On Saturday and Monday, crowds gathered to demand an end to US intervention in the Middle East.
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED