Sponsored link
Friday, April 26, 2024

Sponsored link

News + PoliticsThe Beast on Bryant will face planning delay

The Beast on Bryant will face planning delay

Developer pulls back condo project in the wake of major community opposition

The site of new condos used to be a community arts space
The site of new condos used to be a community arts space

AUGUST 27, 2015 – The Beast on Bryant, a major development that would turn an entire city block that is now arts and industrial space into luxury condos, will probably be pulled off the Planning Commission agenda for September, meaning the project could be delayed for months or more.

The project planner, Rich Sucre, told me this afternoon that the developer is proposing major design changes that could require a new round of environmental review and change the timeline for project approval.

Among the changes: the developer wants to add 7,500 square feet of production, distribution, and repair space, perhaps in a nod to the widespread community opposition.

The hearing Sept. 10 was bound to be heated. Many of the same people who have opposed the Monster in the Mission (which is also now in limbo) are lining up against the Bryant Street project, and the commission hearing would have been packed with opponents.

The project not only involves the displacement of a longtime arts space but would change the use of a city block at a time when many in the Mission are arguing that market-rate condos are destroying the community and doing more harm than good for the housing crisis.

Developer Nick Podell cut a deal with the operators of InnerMission, a community arts institution, but many still opposed the project.

At recent rallies around the “Monster in the Mission” at the 16th Street BART plaza, banners denouncing the “Beast on Bryant” were visible, and the activists were united in opposition to both projects.

The changes may be strategic – a recognition that the Planning Commission might have denied the conditional-use permit Podell needs to build his condos. If the vote was no, he would have to wait two years to bring the proposal back.

So while a moratorium on market-rate housing in the Mission heads for a November vote, the community uprising appears to have already had an impact on at least two major projects.

The message – that Mission residents and businesses want affordable housing and the preservation of PDR space, not new luxury housing – keeps gaining traction.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.

Sponsored link

Featured

Supes rent-relief program saved 20,000 people from eviction during the pandemic

New city report shows how taxing the rich to help low-income renters is highly effective.

Nothing’s gonna rain on ‘Funny Girl’ Katerina McCrimmon’s SF parade

“I've always been fighting to make it this far," says the dynamo Fanny Brice with Miami roots and plenty of chutzpah.

Supes put a hold on Breed’s Treasure Island developer bailout plan

Mayor's Office, developers now have to figure out how to move forward with a deeply troubled project

More by this author

Supreme Court hears critical case on homeless policy (SF wants to legalize sweeps) …

... Plus: Is the SF Zoo really capable of hosting pandas, and is the city ready to start letting developers off the hook for the impacts their projects create? That's The Agenda for April 24-31

Is protesting in traffic ‘false imprisonment?’

Then what about Waymo blocking a highway entrance ramp?

New conservative DCCC members will face vote on critical labor issues

Will the 'moderate' majority elected with tech money support bills that regulate AI, robotaxis, and robotrucks?
Sponsored link

You might also likeRELATED