Sunday, May 16, 2021
News + Politics The problem with Tasers

The problem with Tasers

Doc film shows how people die as company tells cops its product is perfectly safe. Every Police Commission member needs to see this film


Every member of the San Francisco Police Commission needs to see the movie I just watched.

It’s called Killing Them Safely, and I caught it at the Roxie. You want to understand the problems with arming the cops with Tasers? It’s all here.


Director Nick Bernadini got amazing access to Taser International, interviews with its key players – and footage from depositions that executive gave in lawsuits over deaths that the devices caused.

He also talked to small-town police officers in Warren, Michigan, who used the weapons the way they were trained to use them – and people died.

The message from the documentary is this:

A company that had come up with this electronic shock device that was supposed to immobilize people was deeply in debt and near bankruptcy because the stun gun didn’t always work. So they quadrupled the voltage, marketed it aggressively, made a fortune in the process – and ignored or downplayed warnings and evidence that the Tasers might not be safe.

In fact, in marketing materials and training sessions with police departments, the Taser team said that there was no way the electric shocks the guns delivered could possibly cause any harm, other than momentary incapacitation and a couple to tiny puncture wounds.

So the cops were told, in essence, that this was an entirely safe way to subdue someone. Go ahead, shoot with the Taser; nobody can get hurt.

It turns out that lots of people can get hurt.

The lawyers who are interviewed compare Taser to the tobacco industry, which for years had data to show that its product was deadly but ignored and suppressed it. In this case, the company’s senior executives insisted, under oath, over and over, that they had no reason to believe that zapping someone with their guns could cause any health problems.

The 270 people who had died? They would have died anyway, the executives said. They must have had other health problems.

The documentary reveals how scientists hired by Taser reported that heart muscles could essentially stop working when hit by the jots; nothing changed.

Eventually, the company decided to warn its customers not to shoot people in the chest – but said that the guns were still safe, and the issue was just potential litigation.

Oh, and by the way: Almost all of the training that officers got, and the information they were given, came from Taser.

So cops just zapped folks left and right, their brand new toy and easy way to solve any situation (including simple traffic stops, after which one young man was Tased and died.) A man from Poland who was lost in a Canadian airport, and agitated ad confused after a long flight when he couldn’t find a way out, was Tased and died.

And all along, Taser officials said that the weapons were nearly 100 percent safe, that they saved lives by giving cops and alternative to using batons, pepper spray, or guns.

In the end, the chief and the cops from Warren, and officials from British Columbia, where Tasers were either banner or largely banned, said they were doing just fine without the stun guns: There were no more injuries to officers, no more injuries to suspects … the Tasers had done nothing but caused problems.

Taser officials say they are saving lives by offering cops a non-lethal alternative to shooting someone. But crisis intervention, slowing down, space and time, and lots of other options are also non-lethal, and in every one of the past five officer-involved shootings in SF, there was no need for lethal force.

And what the data in the movie shows is that if you give cops Tasers, they become a crutch – just zap people first and figure out the situation later Which is sometimes way too late.

This comes up Wednesday at the Police Commission, which meets at 5:30 in Room 400 City Hall.

Tim Redmond
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.


  1. Could someone give me an alternative to guns that is 100% safe. I want something now I’m tired of the shootings and don’t want to wait for an alternative is perfect while people are being killed. I know tasers are less lethal than guns.

  2. “my room mate Lori Is getting paid on the internet $98/hr”…..!tr204ur

    two days ago grey McLaren. P1 I bought after earning 18,512 was my previous month’s payout..just a little over.17k Dollars Last month..3-5 hours job a day…with weekly’s realy the simplest. job I have ever Do.. I Joined This 7 months. ago. and now making over hourly. 87 Dollars…Learn. More right Here !tr204u:➽:➽:.➽.➽.➽.➽ http://GlobalSuperJobsReportsEmploymentsLightGetPay$98Hour…. .β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…::::::!tr204o….,….

  3. The mayor, SFBOS, members of the police commission, SFPOA, and anyone else can watch Killing Us Safely on Netflix

  4. Me, too. But the likelihood of being Tased by a cop is far greater than being shot by one. Police officers nationwide have been shown to be cavalier and indiscriminate in their use of these torture toys.

  5. I’d rather be tased than shot, or hit by a baton for that matter.

    As for the concern that they may be used too casually, there are ways to control that, e.g. mandatory incident reports after each Taser firing, subject to audit and public access. Tasers can’t be reloaded by the officer once fired, so it’s not as if a firing can be hidden from the SFPD. I would assume similar procedures already exist for firearms.

    The current doctrinaire approach means to avoid the possibility of someone dying off a heart attack when tased, we are guaranteeing a certain number of people will be killed from firearms. The best is the enemy of the good.

  6. Do you think that you and your loved ones are somehow exempt from being wrongfully Tased, to pain, trauma, and possibly death, by the police?

  7. Shields are non-lethal, knife-proof and even bullet-proof. Batons only if necessary when shields don’t work.

  8. I saw the video of the Gongera execution and it still gives me chills. Was he a knife wielding criminal? Was he having some type of seizure or on drugs? Either way he had his back against the wall and was surrounded by four police with guns. They could have shot him one time in the stomach. They didn’t have to pulverize him to death with enough rounds of bullets to kill a charging rhino.

    Why is anyone so surprised that being zapped by a high voltage electrical force can kill you?

  9. It’s this kind of maximalist ideology that leads to cops having only firearms to subdue a knife-wielding criminal like Luis Gongera. The vague and glibly hand-waving alternatives listed are utterly disconnected from reality, and the SFPD certainly didn’t have the option of leaving a potentially unstable person walking around with a knife. I certainly hope the Polive Commission will rescind its knee-jerk refusal to allow the SFPD to purchase non lethal weapons.

Comments are closed.

More by this author

Can people paying rent for a parking space be evicted for living in cars?

Caltrans is about to try to remove people from a lot under I-80.

Boudin allies speak out at a rally against ‘recall madness’

Elected officials, labor, and community leaders say that the DA has kept his campaign promises.

State Legislature moving to give telecom companies immense power

Bills would block any local control over placement of cell towers and antennas -- and it's passing with almost no opposition.

Is San Francisco a ‘conservative’ city? That’s what the Chron thinks.

But is opposing the Big Business and Big Tech Agenda really 'conservative?' Plus: Free Muni --and a complex new Muni yard. That's The Agenda for May 10-18.

Fate of Bayview facility threatens City College funding chances

The school promised $35 million to the community. Now, a battle over an obscure legal concept has the supes and the College Board at odds.

Most read

What happened to Halston? New doc dives deep into designer’s story

In Halston, the new biopic about the visionary American fashion designer, director FrΓ©dΓ©ric Tcheng makes every effort to remain objective when portraying the contentious...

Not one dollar of state rent-relief money has arrived in SF

Hundreds of millions in federal funding is available -- but tenants aren't getting it.

Boudin allies speak out at a rally against ‘recall madness’

Elected officials, labor, and community leaders say that the DA has kept his campaign promises.

Can people paying rent for a parking space be evicted for living in cars?

Caltrans is about to try to remove people from a lot under I-80.

You might also likeRELATED